Most citizens seem underinformed about politics. Many experts claim that only well-informed citizens can make good political decisions. Is this claim correct? In The Democratic Dilemma, Professors Lupia and McCubbins combine insights from political science, economics and the cognitive sciences to explain how citizens gather and use information. They show when citizens who lack information can (and cannot) make the same decisions they would have made if better informed. As a result, they clarify the debate about citizen competence.
Theory of politics that integrates insights from political science, public opinion, economics, psychology and cognitive science
Specific about when limited information does and does not prevent reasoned choice
Employs formal models of learning and choice, lab experiments on persuasion and delegation, public opinion surveys, and case studies
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
论证方式不太习惯，但内容和结论都挺有趣的。
评分论证方式不太习惯，但内容和结论都挺有趣的。
评分论证方式不太习惯，但内容和结论都挺有趣的。
评分论证方式不太习惯，但内容和结论都挺有趣的。
评分论证方式不太习惯，但内容和结论都挺有趣的。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有