PREFACE<br > In most cases， when the word life is used it pertains mainly<br >to humanity but also justifies plants， animals， organs， and matter<br >and characterizes them through their ability to ingest nutrients to<br >create energy and growth and through excretion of waste to empty<br >their organs and then take in more nutrients to produce energy.<br >Generation being the mainstay for life.<br >Existence is the stage of life， or fact of being， and the continuance<br >of living. Anyone， or thing who lives， or exists is assumed to do<br >so， as maintenance for this sensation of life.<br > Life is used to describe being and what happens to something<br >during their existence as a product of generation. What I am having<br >difficulty in explaining is how far can we go in describing life when we<br >start with the animated product defined as humanity. And to animals<br >which appear to cover all animated life and then organs are classified<br >as a part of this same life. Plants and vegetation seem to be included<br >however minerals， including earth， dust， rocks or sand seem to be<br >excluded， just as atomic structures are， even though these structures<br >include every creature in our universe. Hopes for these to be included<br >as living beings seem to be purposely neglected even in some of the<br >semi-closed minds of present day scientists who will not accept matter<br >in certain forms to be life.<br > Earth， a product developed by our planet to encase its nucleus<br >of molten magma is considered as matter， however not a part of real<br >life even though it is constructed partially of the same matter， or atomic<br >substances， just as the rest of life， including humanity. If size could be<br >