Popular Religion in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Professor Stephan Feuchtwang is an emeritus professor of the Department of Anthropology, the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). He has been engaged in research on popular religion and politics in mainland China and Taiwan since 1966, resulting in a number of publications on charisma, place, temples and festivals, and civil society. He has recently been engaged in a comparative project exploring the theme of the recognition of catastrophic loss, including the loss of archive and recall, which in Chinese cosmology and possibly elsewhere is pre-figured in the category of ghosts. Most recently he has been pursuing a project on the comparison of civilisations and empires.
- 宗教
- 海外中国研究
- 民间信仰
- 人类学
- 英文原版
- 社会学/人类学
- 历史
- 民间宗教
The institution of local festivals and temples is not as well known as that of ancestor worship, but it is just as much a universal fact of Chinese life. Its content is an imperial metaphor, which stands in relation to the rest of its participants' lives as the poetry of collective vision, theatrically performed, built and painted in temples, carved and clothed in statues. Stephan Feuchtwang has brought together unpublished as well as published results of his own and other anthropologists' fieldwork in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan and put them into an historical, political and theoretical context.
Students of anthropology will be intrigued. This is not a religion of a Book. Nor is it one of the named religions of China. Popular religion includes some elements of both Buddhism and the former imperial cults, more of Daoism, but it is identifiable with none of them. It is popular in the sense of being local and true of the China of the Han, or Chinese-speaking people, where every place had or has its local cults and the festivals peculiar to them. Its rites, in particular offerings of incense and fire, suggest a concept of religion. It is quite different from theories of religion based on doctrine and belief.
Students of politics will also find here vital and new perspectives. Politics is never far from religion, least of all in the People's Republic of China or colonial and post-colonial Taiwan.
具体描述
读后感
如题，作为一个历史系学生，断断续续翻了1周，一开始我就读不懂序言，跳到第一章开始读，还是读不懂。估计是因为翻译太烂以及本人完全不懂人类学术语，总之，大家选择看之前需谨慎。 以上！ ...................................................................................
评分在中国历史的宏大叙事话语中，民间社会被湮没在大一统的政治幻象里，仿佛在推行中央集权的古典专制时代，它完全被自上而下的建构，不存在任何自发形成的可能性。这种对于历史的误读来自历史书写自身的局限。清末，梁启超就提出二十四史本质上是帝王的家谱写作，认为历史视角永...
评分按照章节整理一下读书笔记。可读性非常差的一本书，疯狂吐槽中文译本，译者相当死板的一个字一个字的对译了，完全不管别扭的用词和不通顺的语句╮(╯▽╰)╭ 第一章 重新界定民间宗教信仰与帝国正统仪式是“隐喻性的关系”，从而弥补既存解释模式的缺陷（马丁的表演论、尼德海...
评分《帝国的隐喻：中国民间宗教》是一本真正让人昏昏欲睡的书（好吧，我承认自己看不进高深的理论）。诚如译序所说，这本书一上来就大谈理论，凌空虚蹈莫测高深。但是理论归理论，首先让人抓狂的是翻译。看看这么几段： “我所询问的许多人都说，地方性庙宇中的神都有官员...
评分虽然这不是一个新问题了，但是经常在读不懂原文和更读不懂翻译之间挣扎。 最近连续读了几个原文+译文，发现其实很多译者在术语上都已经尽力了。反而是一些英文的习惯说法或者语序颠倒的问题上翻译错误造成了整个一段甚至一章都令人困惑。 举个例子，原文第九页说到but far from...
用户评价
英语太地道了，每看一分钟就要走五分钟的神……所以我不敢说我看明白了。
评分such an intricate piece of work.some point itself seems to be metaphoric.my point is whether the whole framework is a bit over-political.
评分英语太地道了，每看一分钟就要走五分钟的神……所以我不敢说我看明白了。
评分第三章是核心
评分中文版和英文版差距实在太大了
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有