Jeff Goodwin
Professor of Sociology
New York University
Jeff Goodwin's research interests include social movements, revolutions, and terrorism. He has conducted research in Central America, the Philippines, South Africa, and Ireland as well as in the United States. He earned his BA (1980, Social Studies), MA (1983, Sociology), and PhD (1988, Sociology) at Harvard University.
Professor Goodwin's e-mail address is jeff.goodwin@nyu.edu. His mailing address is Department of Sociology, New York University, 295 Lafayette Street, Room 4115, New York, NY 10012.
No Other Way Out provides a powerful explanation for the emergence of popular revolutionary movements, and the occurrence of actual revolutions, during the Cold War era. This sweeping study ranges from Southeast Asia in the 1940s and 1950s to Central America in the 1970s and 1980s and Eastern Europe in 1989. Goodwin demonstrates how the actions of specific types of authoritarian regimes unwittingly channeled popular resistance into radical and often violent directions. By comparing the historical trajectories of more than a dozen countries, Goodwin also shows how revolutionaries were able to create opportunities for seizing state power.
不同于Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提出的是以State为研究对象的State-centered perspective来研究革命的形成与结果(失败/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定义来指出:revolution in fa...
評分不同于Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提出的是以State为研究对象的State-centered perspective来研究革命的形成与结果(失败/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定义来指出:revolution in fa...
評分不同于Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提出的是以State为研究对象的State-centered perspective来研究革命的形成与结果(失败/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定义来指出:revolution in fa...
評分不同于Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提出的是以State为研究对象的State-centered perspective来研究革命的形成与结果(失败/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定义来指出:revolution in fa...
評分不同于Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提出的是以State为研究对象的State-centered perspective来研究革命的形成与结果(失败/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定义来指出:revolution in fa...
形式理論框架在handbook中有一篇更加簡練的總結。第二章有一個對於Mitchell Timothy批評的迴應。
评分Chap. 1-4:總覺得理論框架和實際的案例有點脫節,Communist insurgency興起的解釋倒是更和Legacies of colonial rule有關,而不是書中兜售的State-centered perspective
评分Chap. 1-4:總覺得理論框架和實際的案例有點脫節,Communist insurgency興起的解釋倒是更和Legacies of colonial rule有關,而不是書中兜售的State-centered perspective
评分Chap. 1-4:總覺得理論框架和實際的案例有點脫節,Communist insurgency興起的解釋倒是更和Legacies of colonial rule有關,而不是書中兜售的State-centered perspective
评分Chap. 1-4:總覺得理論框架和實際的案例有點脫節,Communist insurgency興起的解釋倒是更和Legacies of colonial rule有關,而不是書中兜售的State-centered perspective
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有