Georg Lukacs (1885-1971) is now recognized as one of the most innovative and best-informed literary critics of the twentieth century. Trained in the German philosophic tradition of Kant, Hegel, and Marx, he escaped Nazi persecution by fleeing to the Soviet Union in 1933. There he faced a new set of problems: Stalinist dogmatism about literature and literary criticism. Maneuvering between the obstacles of censorship, he wrote and published his longest work of literary criticism, "The Historical Novel", in 1937. Beginning with the novels of Sir Walter Scott, "The Historical Novel" documents the evolution of a genre that came to dominate European fiction in the years after Napoleon. The novel had reached a point at which it could be socially and politically critical as well as psychologically insightful.Lukacs devotes his final chapter to the anti-Nazi fiction of Germany and Austria. Georg Lukacs' works include "The Theory of the Novel" (1920), "The History of Class Consciousness" (1923), "Studies in European Realism" (1948), and "The Young Hegel" (revised edition, 1954). Fredric Jameson is William A. Lane Professor of Comparative Literature, Director of the Graduate Program in Literature, and Director of the Duke Center for Critical Theory at Duke University. He is the author of many articles and books, including "Marxism and Form" (1971), "The Prison-House of Language" (1972), "The Political Unconscious" (1981), and "Postmodernism", or, the "Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism" (1991).
具體描述
讀後感
In his discussion of Scott’s historical novel, Lukacs criticizes critics who try to understand Scott through biographical materials, not only because such evidence tells little about the ‘real history’ of the rise of the historical novel, but, more impor...
評分In his discussion of Scott’s historical novel, Lukacs criticizes critics who try to understand Scott through biographical materials, not only because such evidence tells little about the ‘real history’ of the rise of the historical novel, but, more impor...
評分In his discussion of Scott’s historical novel, Lukacs criticizes critics who try to understand Scott through biographical materials, not only because such evidence tells little about the ‘real history’ of the rise of the historical novel, but, more impor...
評分In his discussion of Scott’s historical novel, Lukacs criticizes critics who try to understand Scott through biographical materials, not only because such evidence tells little about the ‘real history’ of the rise of the historical novel, but, more impor...
評分In his discussion of Scott’s historical novel, Lukacs criticizes critics who try to understand Scott through biographical materials, not only because such evidence tells little about the ‘real history’ of the rise of the historical novel, but, more impor...
用戶評價
挺有啓發，但把這三百多頁全部啃完，總覺得浪費精力......最後一章有部分中譯。想把書裏的great全部去掉，三句話就要來一個great，巴爾紮剋聽見盧卡契這麼誇他，棺材闆都要紅的......
评分意識形態統帥之下，並不掩沒一個優秀批評傢的直覺
评分意識形態統帥之下，並不掩沒一個優秀批評傢的直覺
评分挺有啓發，但把這三百多頁全部啃完，總覺得浪費精力......最後一章有部分中譯。想把書裏的great全部去掉，三句話就要來一個great，巴爾紮剋聽見盧卡契這麼誇他，棺材闆都要紅的......
评分挺有啓發，但把這三百多頁全部啃完，總覺得浪費精力......最後一章有部分中譯。想把書裏的great全部去掉，三句話就要來一個great，巴爾紮剋聽見盧卡契這麼誇他，棺材闆都要紅的......
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有