The methodology of introspection, and especially of stimulated recall, is gaining increasing popularity in second language research. This book provides a "how-to" guide for researchers considering using this technique, contextualized within a history of the procedure and a discussion of its strengths and weaknesses. Topics covered in depth include: * research questions for which this methodology is (and is not) well-suited, * preparing for data collection, * transcribing, coding, and analyzing stimulated recall data, and * avoiding common pitfalls in the use of this methodology. By way of demonstration, the authors walk readers, step by step, through several studies in different areas of second language education which have used this technique, including L2 writing, reading, oral interaction, and interlanguage pragmatics. This book is one of several in LEA's Second Language Acquisition Research Series dealing with specific data collection methods or instruments. Each of these monographs addresses the kinds of research questions for which the method/instrument is best suited, its underlying assumptions, a characterization of the method/instrument and extended description of its use, and problems associated with its use. For more information about these volumes, please visit LEA's Web site at www.erlbaum.com.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
这学期的project在导师的推荐下读了这本书，用了这个方法。这个方法的一个foundation也就是说单一的explanation不靠谱，所以我们需要参与者的自省，也就是他们自己的justification。所以stimulated recall 也就是from participants’ perspective，其实可以很好的中和analysts’ perspective。另一个优点相较于即时采访，它可以给研究人员一些时间去看data，更新自己的questions. 但问题也有，就是participants can only answer what they know。
评分这学期的project在导师的推荐下读了这本书，用了这个方法。这个方法的一个foundation也就是说单一的explanation不靠谱，所以我们需要参与者的自省，也就是他们自己的justification。所以stimulated recall 也就是from participants’ perspective，其实可以很好的中和analysts’ perspective。另一个优点相较于即时采访，它可以给研究人员一些时间去看data，更新自己的questions. 但问题也有，就是participants can only answer what they know。
评分个人觉得作为研究工具，其效度建立于认知和元认知的可及性和（相对）准确性之上，确实是有很大风险。可是目前很难找到另外的高效获取内省信息的方法，所以只能是a risk one has to live with了
评分这学期的project在导师的推荐下读了这本书，用了这个方法。这个方法的一个foundation也就是说单一的explanation不靠谱，所以我们需要参与者的自省，也就是他们自己的justification。所以stimulated recall 也就是from participants’ perspective，其实可以很好的中和analysts’ perspective。另一个优点相较于即时采访，它可以给研究人员一些时间去看data，更新自己的questions. 但问题也有，就是participants can only answer what they know。
评分个人觉得作为研究工具，其效度建立于认知和元认知的可及性和（相对）准确性之上，确实是有很大风险。可是目前很难找到另外的高效获取内省信息的方法，所以只能是a risk one has to live with了
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有