In this important book Habermas develops his views on a range of moral and ethical issues. Drawing on his theory of communicative action, Habermas elaborates an original conception of 'discourse ethics', seeking to reconstruct a moral point of view from which normative claims can be impartially judged.
Habermas connects communicative ethics to the theory of social action via an examination of research in the social psychology of moral and interpersonal development. He aims to show that our basic moral intuitions spring from something deeper and more universal than contingent features of our tradition, namely from normative presuppositions of social interaction that belong to the repertoire of competent agents in any society.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action confronts directly a variety of difficult and controversial problems which are at the centre of current debates in philosophy and social and political theory.
評分
評分
評分
評分
Reach a universalistic morality/norm by public,free argument of equal individuals bringing own interests and putting themselves into other individuals' shoes in the community.Goal is still universal justice,but the way is by neither theorist's definite conception nor Rawl's individual decision under veil of ignorance,but communicative consent.
评分Reach a universalistic morality/norm by public,free argument of equal individuals bringing own interests and putting themselves into other individuals' shoes in the community.Goal is still universal justice,but the way is by neither theorist's definite conception nor Rawl's individual decision under veil of ignorance,but communicative consent.
评分Reach a universalistic morality/norm by public,free argument of equal individuals bringing own interests and putting themselves into other individuals' shoes in the community.Goal is still universal justice,but the way is by neither theorist's definite conception nor Rawl's individual decision under veil of ignorance,but communicative consent.
评分Reach a universalistic morality/norm by public,free argument of equal individuals bringing own interests and putting themselves into other individuals' shoes in the community.Goal is still universal justice,but the way is by neither theorist's definite conception nor Rawl's individual decision under veil of ignorance,but communicative consent.
评分Reach a universalistic morality/norm by public,free argument of equal individuals bringing own interests and putting themselves into other individuals' shoes in the community.Goal is still universal justice,but the way is by neither theorist's definite conception nor Rawl's individual decision under veil of ignorance,but communicative consent.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有