In this classic text, James W. Carey maintains that communication is not merely the transmission of information; reminding the reader of the link between the words 'communication' and 'community', he broadens his definition to include the drawing - together of a people that is culture. In this context, Carey questions the American tradition of focusing only on mass communication's function as a means of social and political control, and makes a case for examining the content of a communication - the meaning of symbols, not only the motives that originate them or the purposes they serve.He seeks to recast the goal of communication studies, replacing the search for deterministic laws of behavior with a simpler, yet far more challenging mission: 'to enlarge the human conversation by comprehending what others are saying'. This new edition includes a new critical foreword by G. Stuart Adam that explains Carey's fundamental role in transforming the study of mass communication to include a cultural perspective and connects his classic essays with contemporary media issues and trends. This edition also adds a new, complete bibliography of all of Carey's writings.
James W Carey was a distinguished and respected communications theorist, media critic and a teacher of journalists latterly at Columbia University. He died in 2006 at age 71. Carey 提出传播科技的分水岭就是电报的发明。认为它使得time 和space 变得irrelevant了...
评分James W Carey was a distinguished and respected communications theorist, media critic and a teacher of journalists latterly at Columbia University. He died in 2006 at age 71. Carey 提出传播科技的分水岭就是电报的发明。认为它使得time 和space 变得irrelevant了...
评分詹姆斯·凯瑞是美国文化研究的主要代表人物,他的传播"仪式观"的提出,为美国传播学的研究开辟了新的路径。 詹姆斯凯瑞的传播学研究开始于20世纪50年代,当时正是拉扎斯菲尔德开创的效果研究模式盛行的时候,当时主流的传播研究一直是在"传递观"中书写的,美国经验学派的传播学研...
评分序言里,潘忠党教授提到译丛的价值,国外的理论对于我们研究国内现状的作用,这些书可以帮助我们注意到需要研究的问题,并将问题提升到理论层面来表达,我们的落脚点是中国。“切实研究中国的问题,远比抽象地呼吁本土‘本土化’更有建设意义。这是我所理解的‘借鉴’。所谓批...
评分its ritual view is astonishing!
评分不好读
评分打四星,因为觉得作者没有考虑到非英语母语学生的阅读感受……累死我了(T ^ T)
评分因为老师要求读很多他的文章,然而…
评分对照阅读,未来的历史那篇没读。或因论文成书,Carey在每篇文章中的论述都不够彻底、深入,有些地方逻辑性不强。转笔也太快,不够扎实。例如,论述commodity fetish那部分,突然in particular然后说马克思的商品拜物是在去市场的语境中的,略脱线。这样让读者摸不着头脑的地方还蛮多的。比较像讲稿。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有