Philosophical developments in the 1980s lent themselves favourably to what has become known as the theological turn of contemporary French thought (and specifically phenomenology). But philosophical change was also mirrored in socio-political change, sometimes in paradoxical ways. Democratisation post 1980 elevated the identity of the individual believer to a positive and credible place in France's socio-political infrastructure. Phenomenology, on the other hand, 'demoted' the religious subject only in the process to restore him to what Jean-Yves Lacoste calls his appropriate dwelling place of 'naIvete'. In the transition from the democratisation of the individual as self-sufficient and politically pragmatic to his (anti)philosophical counterpart in a new postsubjectivity, there is a shared narrative of having come through a set of crises (one historical in the name of French republican universalism, the other philosophical in the name of metaphysical ontology). The Return of Religion in France charts this dual trajectory with the aim of demonstrating how a new religious 'subject' re-emerges as a respective social engineer and a direct inheritor of the event of Christianity.
评分
评分
评分
评分
要换一波理论家膜了,不错的介绍。后世俗化背景下重提宗教其实不是回归,而是改造。副标题“从民主化到后形而上学”,民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等),大部分时间在谈哲学。
评分要换一波理论家膜了,不错的介绍。后世俗化背景下重提宗教其实不是回归,而是改造。副标题“从民主化到后形而上学”,民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等),大部分时间在谈哲学。
评分要换一波理论家膜了,不错的介绍。后世俗化背景下重提宗教其实不是回归,而是改造。副标题“从民主化到后形而上学”,民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等),大部分时间在谈哲学。
评分要换一波理论家膜了,不错的介绍。后世俗化背景下重提宗教其实不是回归,而是改造。副标题“从民主化到后形而上学”,民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等),大部分时间在谈哲学。
评分要换一波理论家膜了,不错的介绍。后世俗化背景下重提宗教其实不是回归,而是改造。副标题“从民主化到后形而上学”,民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等),大部分时间在谈哲学。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有