Philosophical developments in the 1980s lent themselves favourably to what has become known as the theological turn of contemporary French thought (and specifically phenomenology). But philosophical change was also mirrored in socio-political change, sometimes in paradoxical ways. Democratisation post 1980 elevated the identity of the individual believer to a positive and credible place in France's socio-political infrastructure. Phenomenology, on the other hand, 'demoted' the religious subject only in the process to restore him to what Jean-Yves Lacoste calls his appropriate dwelling place of 'naIvete'. In the transition from the democratisation of the individual as self-sufficient and politically pragmatic to his (anti)philosophical counterpart in a new postsubjectivity, there is a shared narrative of having come through a set of crises (one historical in the name of French republican universalism, the other philosophical in the name of metaphysical ontology). The Return of Religion in France charts this dual trajectory with the aim of demonstrating how a new religious 'subject' re-emerges as a respective social engineer and a direct inheritor of the event of Christianity.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
要換一波理論傢膜瞭，不錯的介紹。後世俗化背景下重提宗教其實不是迴歸，而是改造。副標題“從民主化到後形而上學”，民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等)，大部分時間在談哲學。
评分要換一波理論傢膜瞭，不錯的介紹。後世俗化背景下重提宗教其實不是迴歸，而是改造。副標題“從民主化到後形而上學”，民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等)，大部分時間在談哲學。
评分要換一波理論傢膜瞭，不錯的介紹。後世俗化背景下重提宗教其實不是迴歸，而是改造。副標題“從民主化到後形而上學”，民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等)，大部分時間在談哲學。
评分要換一波理論傢膜瞭，不錯的介紹。後世俗化背景下重提宗教其實不是迴歸，而是改造。副標題“從民主化到後形而上學”，民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等)，大部分時間在談哲學。
评分要換一波理論傢膜瞭，不錯的介紹。後世俗化背景下重提宗教其實不是迴歸，而是改造。副標題“從民主化到後形而上學”，民主化部分太少(宗教教育、身份政治等)，大部分時間在談哲學。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有