This book discusses the Aristotelian setting of Thomas Hobbes' main work on natural philosophy, "De Corpore" (1655). Leijenhorst's study puts particular emphasis on the second part of the work, entitled "Philosophia Prima," Although Hobbes presents his mechanistic philosophy of nature as an outright replacement of Aristotelian physics, he continued to use the vocabulary and arguments of sixteenth and seventeenth-century Aristotelianism. Leijenhorst shows that while in some cases this common vocabulary hides profound conceptual innovations, in other cases Hobbes' self-proclaimed "new" philosophy is simply old wine in new sacks. Leijenhorst's book substantially enriches our insight in the complexity of the rise of modern philosophy and the way it struggled with the Aristotelian heritage.
评分
评分
评分
评分
其实是在说Short Tract毫无新意,De Corpore 旧瓶装新酒。这个结论值得商榷,为了打掉亚里士多德主义,当然得使用形质论了。
评分其实是在说Short Tract毫无新意,De Corpore 旧瓶装新酒。这个结论值得商榷,为了打掉亚里士多德主义,当然得使用形质论了。
评分其实是在说Short Tract毫无新意,De Corpore 旧瓶装新酒。这个结论值得商榷,为了打掉亚里士多德主义,当然得使用形质论了。
评分其实是在说Short Tract毫无新意,De Corpore 旧瓶装新酒。这个结论值得商榷,为了打掉亚里士多德主义,当然得使用形质论了。
评分其实是在说Short Tract毫无新意,De Corpore 旧瓶装新酒。这个结论值得商榷,为了打掉亚里士多德主义,当然得使用形质论了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有