This book discusses the Aristotelian setting of Thomas Hobbes' main work on natural philosophy, "De Corpore" (1655). Leijenhorst's study puts particular emphasis on the second part of the work, entitled "Philosophia Prima," Although Hobbes presents his mechanistic philosophy of nature as an outright replacement of Aristotelian physics, he continued to use the vocabulary and arguments of sixteenth and seventeenth-century Aristotelianism. Leijenhorst shows that while in some cases this common vocabulary hides profound conceptual innovations, in other cases Hobbes' self-proclaimed "new" philosophy is simply old wine in new sacks. Leijenhorst's book substantially enriches our insight in the complexity of the rise of modern philosophy and the way it struggled with the Aristotelian heritage.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
其實是在說Short Tract毫無新意，De Corpore 舊瓶裝新酒。這個結論值得商榷，為瞭打掉亞裏士多德主義，當然得使用形質論瞭。
评分其實是在說Short Tract毫無新意，De Corpore 舊瓶裝新酒。這個結論值得商榷，為瞭打掉亞裏士多德主義，當然得使用形質論瞭。
评分其實是在說Short Tract毫無新意，De Corpore 舊瓶裝新酒。這個結論值得商榷，為瞭打掉亞裏士多德主義，當然得使用形質論瞭。
评分其實是在說Short Tract毫無新意，De Corpore 舊瓶裝新酒。這個結論值得商榷，為瞭打掉亞裏士多德主義，當然得使用形質論瞭。
评分其實是在說Short Tract毫無新意，De Corpore 舊瓶裝新酒。這個結論值得商榷，為瞭打掉亞裏士多德主義，當然得使用形質論瞭。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有