霍布斯(Thomas Hobbes, 1588-1679),英国人,他是西方最重要的政治哲学家之一,他对国家和法律的根本问题进行了精深的思考。主要著作有《利维坦》、《论公民》等。他的《利维坦》具有非凡的逻辑性和想像力,使政治哲学得到了一种逻辑严密的系统发挥,成为经世名著。
He that is to govern a whole nation, must read in himself, not this, or that particular man; but mankind. Leviathan is both a magnificent literary achievement and the greatest work of political philosophy in the English language. Permanently challenging, it has found new applications and new refutations in every generation. Hobbes argues that human beings are first and foremost concerned with their own individual desires and fears. He shows that a conflict of each against every man can only be avoided by the adoption of a compact to enforce peace. The compact involves giving up some of our natural freedom to a sovereign power which will enforce the laws of peace on all citizens. Hobbes also analyses the subversive forces - religion, ambition, private conscience - that threaten to destroy the body politic, Leviathan itself, and return us to the state of war. This new edition reproduces the first printed text, retaining the original punctuation but modernizing the spelling. It offers exceptionally thorough and useful annotation, an introduction that guides the reader through the complexities of Hobbes's arguments, and a substantial index. ABOUT THE SERIES: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the widest range of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, helpful notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.
罗马法规定,有一种罪人,叫做“神圣的人”,其特点在于: (1)他不可被用来祭祀, (2)人人可以杀死他而不被判处谋杀。 其中(1)表明他是神法的例外,(2)表明他是人法的例外。 在古罗马,人法和神法是相互联系在一起的。在人法中处死一个人,必然是作为给神的献祭的,...
评分 评分今天,当我们谈到民主与专制时,恐怕没有人会怀疑两者孰优孰劣。似乎历史已经向我们证明了:专制是邪恶的、落后的、愚昧的象征,民主是正义的、先进的、智慧的象征,民主制度终将取代专制制度。 然而,这样的普世观念是我们自己认真思考后得出的结论吗?这其中是否掺杂有偏见?...
评分 评分霍布斯的论证非常有逻辑,注意到了很多可能反驳的地方,值得学习。 1.自然状态。(十三章) 霍布斯对自然状态的论证是从人性角度出发的,他认为人有三种欲望,使之争斗:竞争、猜忌、荣誉。 分别代表着利益获得、利益损失(安全)、心理优越。 霍布斯自然状态的前提假设是平等...
霍布斯的主权理论实质上是反无政府主义的,于是他能够得到各个阵营的政治哲学家的一致认同,"monarchy....democracy...whereas the power in all forms, if they be perfect enough to protect them, is the same.",民主也可是威权主义的,只有“自由”站在霍布斯的反面。
评分霍布斯的主权理论实质上是反无政府主义的,于是他能够得到各个阵营的政治哲学家的一致认同,"monarchy....democracy...whereas the power in all forms, if they be perfect enough to protect them, is the same.",民主也可是威权主义的,只有“自由”站在霍布斯的反面。
评分難
评分Ms. Hitz说,无论在当时、还是在现代,霍布斯的政治哲学对于读者来说都是充满挑战的:在当时是激进,在现代是保守。
评分難
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有