Eric Schwitzgebel, Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside, is the coauthor (with Russell T. Hurlburt) of Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic (MIT Press, 2007).
Do you dream in color? If you answer Yes, how can you be sure? Before you recount your vivid memory of a dream featuring all the colors of the rainbow, consider that in the 1950s, researchers found that most people reported dreaming in black and white. In the 1960s—when most movies were in color and more people had color television sets—the vast majority of reported dreams contained color. The most likely explanation for this, according to philosopher Eric Schwitzgebel, is not that exposure to black-and-white media made people misremember their dreams. It is that we simply don’t know whether or not we dream in color. In Perplexities of Consciousness, Schwitzgebel examines various aspects of inner life—dreams, mental imagery, emotions, and other subjective phenomena—and argues that we know very little about our stream of conscious experience. In fact, he contends, we are prone to gross error about our ongoing emotional, visual, and cognitive experiences.
Western philosophical tradition is nearly unanimous on the accuracy of our knowledge or current conscious experience. Schwitzgebel is skeptical. Drawing broadly from historical and recent philosophy and psychology to examine such topics as visual perspective, human echolocation (about which he is doubtful), and the unreliability of introspection even about emotional states (do we really enjoy Christmas? a family dinner?), he finds us singularly inept in our judgments about conscious experience.
评分
评分
评分
评分
有个案有哲学史又有科普,概念分析倒是没多少。作者在导论里说,他不希望自己的书实质上是基于抽象的哲学论证的,同时也对关于意识的形而上学持怀疑态度。作者想通过本书告诉大家:我们对于自己经验的认识往往是不可靠的。
评分有个案有哲学史又有科普,概念分析倒是没多少。作者在导论里说,他不希望自己的书实质上是基于抽象的哲学论证的,同时也对关于意识的形而上学持怀疑态度。作者想通过本书告诉大家:我们对于自己经验的认识往往是不可靠的。
评分有个案有哲学史又有科普,概念分析倒是没多少。作者在导论里说,他不希望自己的书实质上是基于抽象的哲学论证的,同时也对关于意识的形而上学持怀疑态度。作者想通过本书告诉大家:我们对于自己经验的认识往往是不可靠的。
评分有个案有哲学史又有科普,概念分析倒是没多少。作者在导论里说,他不希望自己的书实质上是基于抽象的哲学论证的,同时也对关于意识的形而上学持怀疑态度。作者想通过本书告诉大家:我们对于自己经验的认识往往是不可靠的。
评分有个案有哲学史又有科普,概念分析倒是没多少。作者在导论里说,他不希望自己的书实质上是基于抽象的哲学论证的,同时也对关于意识的形而上学持怀疑态度。作者想通过本书告诉大家:我们对于自己经验的认识往往是不可靠的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有