中国问题 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

☆☆☆☆☆

BERTRAND RUSSELL (1872-1970), was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, religious skeptic, social reformer, socialist and pacifist. Although he spent the majority of his life in England, he was born in Wales, where he also died.

Russell led the British "revolt against idealism" in the early 1900s and is considered one of the founders of analytic philosophy along with his protege Wittgenstein and his elder Frege. He was a prominent anti-war activist, championing free trade between nations and anti-imperialism. Russell was imprisoned for his pacifist activism during World War I, campaigned against Adolf Hitler, for nuclear disarmament, criticised Soviet totalitarianism and the United States of America's involvement in the Vietnam War. In 1950, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, "in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions humanitarian ideals and freedom of thought."

出版者:中央编译出版社

作者:伯特兰·罗素

出品人:

页数:212

译者:

出版时间:2011-5

价格:28.00元

装帧:平装

isbn号码:9787511707512

丛书系列:

图书标签:

中国
罗素眼中的中国
罗素
社会学
哲学
文化
历史
Russell

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到图书目录大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

《中国问题(英文版)》内容简介：1920年10月，罗索怀着对东方智慧国度的敬仰之情抵达上海。他不满于在苏联见到的革命后的种种情形，是到中国来“寻找新的希望”的。罗素在中国讲学、访问一年，悉心研讨中国文化，尤其着眼于中西文化的异同，于1922年发表了《中国问题(英文版)》。时隔近一个世纪，罗素在书中预言的种种情形皆在美国、苏联、中国和日本的发展进程中一一应验了，我们不禁深深为这位睿智的老人所折服。

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

After these preliminary remarks， I come to the theme of this chapter， namely，the present internal condition of China. 　　As everyone knows， China， after having an Emperor for forty centuries，decided， eleven years ago， to become a modern democ...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

罗素先生是一位文学家哲学家，他当年游学中国，根据自己的学识和对中国当时时政和历史的认识，出版了本书。最后提出，中国只有建立一个有效的政府，发展工业和普及教育，才会重新走向强大。一百年后的今天，我们已经建立了一个强大的政府，不是罗素担心的西方有侵略性的政府...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

大三的时候从大四学长那里免费拿来的书，一直到今天才打开。此书罗素写于1922年，其中对中国人性的剖析简单而深刻，对中国社会当时面临的外忧内患做了较为详尽和客观的阐述和分析。对于当时各自心怀鬼胎的英法美日俄之间的虚伪关系及内部斗争，因自己对这段历史不够清楚，所...

评分☆☆☆☆☆