*安德瑞·馬默（Andrei Marmor），美國南加州大學法學院法學教授，法學與哲學研究中心主任。英國牛津大學法學博士，師從拉茲。在法律道德性與政治學之間的關係問題上著述頗豐，著有《社會慣習—從語言到法律》（Social Conventions ： From Language to Law） （普林斯頓大學齣版社2009年版）、《解釋與法律理論》（Interpretation and Legal Theory）（牛津大學齣版社1992年初版；哈特齣版社2005年第2版）、《法哲學》（Philosophy of Law）（普林斯頓大學齣版社2011版）等及大量學術論文。

譯者簡介：

孫海波，江蘇徐州人，北京大學法學院2012級博士研究生，主攻英美法律哲學、司法製度及法律方法，先後在《法律科學》、《法製與社會發展》、《法學論壇》等學術刊物上發錶論文十餘篇，部分文章被《中國社會科學文摘》等轉摘或轉載。

王進，陝西西安人，中國政法大學法學理論專業2012級博士研究生，以色列耶路撒冷希伯來大學聯閤培養博士研究生，主要研究英美法理學、正義理論及政治哲學。在《法哲學與法社會學論叢》、《法學教育研究》等刊物發錶譯文多篇。

In Philosophy of Law, Andrei Marmor provides a comprehensive analysis of contemporary debates about the fundamental nature of law--an issue that has been at the heart of legal philosophy for centuries. What the law is seems to be a matter of fact, but this fact has normative significance: it tells people what they ought to do. Is the normative content of a law entirely determined by the facts that make it a law? Are there some normative moral constraints on what the law can be? And can we fully characterize and define the law without assuming a moral conception about what the law ought to be? Finally, is the philosophy of law about describing what law is, or prescribing what it should be?

Marmor argues that the myriad questions raised by the factual and normative features of law actually depend on the possibility of reduction--whether the legal domain can be explained in terms of something else, more foundational in nature. In addition to exploring the major issues in contemporary legal thought, Philosophy of Law provides a critical analysis of the people and ideas that have dominated the field in past centuries. It will be essential reading for anyone curious about the nature of law.