Deleuze and the Genesis of Representation is a systematic study of three of Deleuze's central works: Difference and Repetition, The Logic of Sense and, with Guattari, Anti-Oedipus. Hughes shows how each of these three works develops the Husserlian problem of genetic constitution. After an innovative reading of Husserl's late work, Hughes turns to a detailed study of the conceptual structures of Deleuze's three books. He demonstrates that each book is surprisingly similar in its structure and that all three function as nearly identical accounts of the genesis of representation. In a highly original and crucial contribution to Deleuze Studies, this book offers a provocative perspective on many of the questions Deleuze's work has raised: What is the status of representation? Of subjectivity? What is a body without organs? How is the virtual produced, and what exactly is its function within Deleuze's thought as a whole? By contextualizing Deleuze's thought within the radicalization of phenomenology, Hughes is able to suggest solutions to these questions that will be as compelling as they are controversial.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
值得注意的是the virtual是如何生成的：生成和三种综合就是直线式的（从dynamic 到static genesis)，并且sense/virtual/pure thought等不是第一性的（cause和quasi-cause的区别）。Blanchot-Hegel和deleuze的相似性（ego-production and sense certainty）的讨论里如果加上对萨特的the transcendence of ego的讨论就更好了。sublimation and symbolization.intensity and idea是（被）生成的，两者继续互相一起生成，再现也分好坏。
评分值得注意的是the virtual是如何生成的：生成和三种综合就是直线式的（从dynamic 到static genesis)，并且sense/virtual/pure thought等不是第一性的（cause和quasi-cause的区别）。Blanchot-Hegel和deleuze的相似性（ego-production and sense certainty）的讨论里如果加上对萨特的the transcendence of ego的讨论就更好了。sublimation and symbolization.intensity and idea是（被）生成的，两者继续互相一起生成，再现也分好坏。
评分值得注意的是the virtual是如何生成的：生成和三种综合就是直线式的（从dynamic 到static genesis)，并且sense/virtual/pure thought等不是第一性的（cause和quasi-cause的区别）。Blanchot-Hegel和deleuze的相似性（ego-production and sense certainty）的讨论里如果加上对萨特的the transcendence of ego的讨论就更好了。sublimation and symbolization.intensity and idea是（被）生成的，两者继续互相一起生成，再现也分好坏。
评分值得注意的是the virtual是如何生成的：生成和三种综合就是直线式的（从dynamic 到static genesis)，并且sense/virtual/pure thought等不是第一性的（cause和quasi-cause的区别）。Blanchot-Hegel和deleuze的相似性（ego-production and sense certainty）的讨论里如果加上对萨特的the transcendence of ego的讨论就更好了。sublimation and symbolization.intensity and idea是（被）生成的，两者继续互相一起生成，再现也分好坏。
评分值得注意的是the virtual是如何生成的：生成和三种综合就是直线式的（从dynamic 到static genesis)，并且sense/virtual/pure thought等不是第一性的（cause和quasi-cause的区别）。Blanchot-Hegel和deleuze的相似性（ego-production and sense certainty）的讨论里如果加上对萨特的the transcendence of ego的讨论就更好了。sublimation and symbolization.intensity and idea是（被）生成的，两者继续互相一起生成，再现也分好坏。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有