亚利桑那大学哲学系讲座教授。她曾在牛津大学和哥伦比亚大学执教,已出版11部著作,内容涉及古代哲学诸多方面,尤其是认识论、心灵哲学和伦理学。
This lively and accessible introduction to Plato focuses on the philosophy and argument of his writings, drawing the reader into Plato's way of doing philosophy, and the general themes of his thinking. This is not a book to leave the reader standing in the outer court of introduction and background information, but leads directly into Plato's argument. It looks at Plato as a thinker grappling with philosophical problems in a variety of ways, rather than a philosopher with a fully worked-out system. It includes a brief account of Plato's life and the various interpretations that have been drawn from the sparse remains of information. It stresses the importance of the founding of the Academy and the conception of philosophy as a subject. Julia Annas discusses Plato's style of writing: his use of the dialogue form, his use of what we today call fiction, and his philosophical transformation of myths. She also looks at his discussions of love and philosophy, his attitude to women, and to homosexual love, explores Plato's claim that virtue is sufficient for happiness, and touches on his arguments for the immortality of the soul and his ideas about the nature of the universe.
很多年前就听过甚至也说过柏拉图式精神恋爱,但这究竟是什么样的,我只是从字面上来理解的,肯定肤浅的不得了。甚至曾一度与“马拉松式恋爱”混同在一起。哲学的东东太深奥,偶看不懂,一直不敢买,只知道有位哲人名字叫柏拉图,他老师是苏格拉底。看“遁入凡尘的柏拉图”这篇...
评分很多年前就听过甚至也说过柏拉图式精神恋爱,但这究竟是什么样的,我只是从字面上来理解的,肯定肤浅的不得了。甚至曾一度与“马拉松式恋爱”混同在一起。哲学的东东太深奥,偶看不懂,一直不敢买,只知道有位哲人名字叫柏拉图,他老师是苏格拉底。看“遁入凡尘的柏拉图”这篇...
评分很多年前就听过甚至也说过柏拉图式精神恋爱,但这究竟是什么样的,我只是从字面上来理解的,肯定肤浅的不得了。甚至曾一度与“马拉松式恋爱”混同在一起。哲学的东东太深奥,偶看不懂,一直不敢买,只知道有位哲人名字叫柏拉图,他老师是苏格拉底。看“遁入凡尘的柏拉图”这篇...
评分以前上本科那会选修过西方哲学史,对柏拉图的生平思想都略知一二,觉得柏拉图是个不识人间烟火的哲学家,他的思想教条色彩太重,让人提不起兴趣来,但读了手头这本《解读柏拉图》,却开始对柏拉图产生了兴趣。 这本《解读柏拉图》篇幅不长,但于柏拉图的生平,形而上学,认...
超喜欢 通俗 简练 同时也是我看的第一本全篇用she 代替he的书 真的很被作者的女权思想触动
评分很好的一本小书。作者一开始就从一个知识/意见之争的故事引出Theaetetus的认识论难题,中间穿插着暗示了说服/理性信服的区别,强调了他哲学的写作方式。中间几章更像是在各个话题下谈柏拉图,比较新的点是女性主义视角的论述。最后才谈了Form,没有一上来就让人了解他的形而上学,这样的安排才是合理简明的导论。
评分@2019-04-18 21:57:04 @2019-04-18 21:57:04
评分挺好的VSI;becoming like god那节有些让人在意
评分Dr. Annas is more careful than necessary. Background information, historical stories, and divergences of scholars are introduced more than what Plato says. Some important aspects of Platonism are skillfully obscured. The discussion on Forms is barely readable. In general, it is more like a booklet for scholars prepared to dig further, while I'm not
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有