John Rawls was James Bryant Conant University Professor at Harvard University. He was recipient of the 1999 National Humanities Medal.
The Law of Peoples John Rawls This book consists of two parts: the essay "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," first published in 1997, and "The Law of Peoples," a major reworking of a much shorter article by the same name published in 1993. Taken together, they are the culmination of more than fifty years of reflection on liberalism and on some of the most pressing problems of our times by John Rawls. "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited" explains why the constraints of public reason, a concept first discussed in Political Liberalism (1993), are ones that holders of both religious and non-religious comprehensive views can reasonably endorse. It is Rawls's most detailed account of how a modern constitutional democracy, based on a liberal political conception, could and would be viewed as legitimate by reasonable citizens who on religious, philosophical, or moral grounds do not themselves accept a liberal comprehensive doctrine--such as that of Kant, or Mill, or Rawls's own "Justice as Fairness," presented in A Theory of Justice (1971). The Law of Peoples extends the idea of a social contract to the Society of Peoples and lays out the general principles that can and should be accepted by both liberal and non-liberal societies as the standard for regulating their behavior toward one another. In particular, it draws a crucial distinction between basic human rights and the rights of each citizen of a liberal constitutional democracy. It explores the terms under which such a society may appropriately wage war against an "outlaw society," and discusses the moral grounds for rendering assistance to non-liberal societies burdened by unfavorable political and economic conditions. John Rawls is James Bryant Conant University Professor, Emeritus, Harvard University, and the author of A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition (see catalog page 32) and Collected Papers (Harvard). 51Z2 x 81Z4 256 pp.
【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
一堆很纠结的概念
评分Rawls一点也不宽容.
评分Rawls一点也不宽容.
评分草草的读完了...
评分没办法打分,因为还没看完。。我能说我是因为在读readings吗哈哈。。不过香港哪儿有卖的哇!!现在普遍缺货耶
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有