Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
这是我十年前读到的第一本西方马克思主义文化批判作品。后来出了新版,阿多尔诺部分是曹卫东翻译的,虽然没读过这个版本,但看到有人说与原文对照的话能看出曹卫东翻译得不好,我不懂德文,无从判断。我看的这个版本(洪佩郁, 蔺月峰译)也是从德文译出的,但多用短句翻译(译...
评分这是我十年前读到的第一本西方马克思主义文化批判作品。后来出了新版,阿多尔诺部分是曹卫东翻译的,虽然没读过这个版本,但看到有人说与原文对照的话能看出曹卫东翻译得不好,我不懂德文,无从判断。我看的这个版本(洪佩郁, 蔺月峰译)也是从德文译出的,但多用短句翻译(译...
评分仔细把三篇主要的文章和附录一再读了一遍。振聋发聩。敏锐到我有时候都怀疑是不是译者自己把当代的问题写进了书里,而不是两位作者在上个世纪初写的。 阿多诺担心的问题跟本雅明是一样的,都是对主体客观化深刻的恐惧。但在这本书里,并没有凸显出阿多诺为人...
评分作为最早研究文化产业的著作,感受到作者的预见性和批判的思想。作者担忧的是文化产业的发展中艺术品将更多的体现出经济资本导向的特点,大众的价值取向也将更多的受到市场规律的影响。作者认为交换价值会引起艺术及内在价值的损害,造成商品贸易之外的道德、情感、传统价值的...
评分在我们生存的时代,大众文化已经如微尘般每时每刻地漂浮在周遭的空气里。我们沉浸在大众文化中,更多的时候已经对它熟视无睹。然而,就在一片昏昏然中,作为消费品的大众文化竟反客为主,成为驾驭人类理性的工具。 多数大众对此或许是不屑一顾的,但欺骗的神话正在真实地上演...
OK,我用自己的话把第一章翻译了一遍,但是仍然是感觉要梳理清楚批判理论的前因后果真是不容易啊!
评分有1944年校勘,做得很好。
评分前三章读完第一遍。
评分历史进程上,人都有欲望要建构一个自为的机器,人创造概念,这些概念在大规模的传播下成为第二自然性,顺从这些就是所谓健康的体现,而反对它,反而需要超人一样的力量。一个社会越是文明,生产力越是得到解放,人的形象就越加孤独与支离破碎,人的内心也越加受到压抑。读的过程中也看到了今后像Foucault写规训与惩罚的影子
评分Adorno果然够刁钻够刻薄,跑到美国把人家文化批判得渣都不剩。他说马克吐温那种蠢到无可救药的作品,却总被美国文化产业用来调戏大众。读得真高兴,我最讨厌的就是美国表面欢快实则空洞的糙文化。adorno,手动赞!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有