"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
一 在过去的很长一段时间内,西方人都把自己的中世纪称为黑暗时代,当然,现在我们已经知道,“黑暗”的中世纪并非黑暗。但试图考量其之所以被称为黑暗的标准,我们就不难发现:人们都是以近代以来的科学精神之标准来看待所谓的中世纪的“黑暗”;而问题则在于这样的一种标准...
评分一 在过去的很长一段时间内,西方人都把自己的中世纪称为黑暗时代,当然,现在我们已经知道,“黑暗”的中世纪并非黑暗。但试图考量其之所以被称为黑暗的标准,我们就不难发现:人们都是以近代以来的科学精神之标准来看待所谓的中世纪的“黑暗”;而问题则在于这样的一种标准...
评分 评分法兰克福学派的重要代表阿多诺是最早完整提出文化工业思考的思想家。而这一概念的提出有其特有的历史背景。具体说来,两次世界大战之后,法西斯主义肆虐全球,改变了社会的政治经济结构,在新的社会结构之下,个人失去了其在政治,经济上的自主的声音,个人的主体性终结了.由于采取...
Adorno果然够刁钻够刻薄,跑到美国把人家文化批判得渣都不剩。他说马克吐温那种蠢到无可救药的作品,却总被美国文化产业用来调戏大众。读得真高兴,我最讨厌的就是美国表面欢快实则空洞的糙文化。adorno,手动赞!
评分没懂
评分前三章读完第一遍。
评分其实这些观点放在现在看来也就那样,但是那时候的人在那个背景下能想到这么些东西的……都是日后折磨莘莘学子的大牛人!文化产业研究必读。
评分So enough.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有