Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
一稿多投233333 读书报告:现代景观社会的基本结构 一、故事的缘起 过去的两百多年见证了人类社会翻天覆地的变化:比过去的几千年还要大。人口越来越多,知识越来越广,机器越来越强大,信息交流越来越方便,战争越来越残酷,休闲娱乐越来越丰富,未来的风险越来越大。这些变化...
評分有人说这本书写得神神叨叨,但一定程度上这不是作者的错而是译者的错。这本书的翻译可以说错谬非常多,很多地方读中译全不可解,读英译才能明白。 译者自称是按照英文译的,又经过德文的校对,但有些地方中译与英译的意思竟然完全相反,而根据上下文只有按照英译的意思才能顺畅...
評分一 在过去的很长一段时间内,西方人都把自己的中世纪称为黑暗时代,当然,现在我们已经知道,“黑暗”的中世纪并非黑暗。但试图考量其之所以被称为黑暗的标准,我们就不难发现:人们都是以近代以来的科学精神之标准来看待所谓的中世纪的“黑暗”;而问题则在于这样的一种标准...
評分一 在过去的很长一段时间内,西方人都把自己的中世纪称为黑暗时代,当然,现在我们已经知道,“黑暗”的中世纪并非黑暗。但试图考量其之所以被称为黑暗的标准,我们就不难发现:人们都是以近代以来的科学精神之标准来看待所谓的中世纪的“黑暗”;而问题则在于这样的一种标准...
評分一稿多投233333 读书报告:现代景观社会的基本结构 一、故事的缘起 过去的两百多年见证了人类社会翻天覆地的变化:比过去的几千年还要大。人口越来越多,知识越来越广,机器越来越强大,信息交流越来越方便,战争越来越残酷,休闲娱乐越来越丰富,未来的风险越来越大。这些变化...
沒懂
评分2017-9 於圖書館九樓南
评分我最討厭的不是英語,也不是從德文翻譯過來的英語。而是那些從文筆優美、動輒引經據典言必希臘辛辣刻薄的德文翻譯過來的英語(尤其是中文本一樣樣的華麗且錯誤也犯的一樣樣的華麗~)
评分難得一比
评分TAT.....................
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有