具体描述
Modern philosophy of science has paid great attention to the understanding of scientific "practice, " in contrast to the earlier concentration on scientific "method." Paul Feyerabend's acclaimed work, which has contributed greatly to this new emphasis, shows the deficiencies of some widespread ideas about the nature of knowledge. He argues that the only feasible explanations of scientific successes are historical explanations, and that anarchism must now replace rationalism in the theory of knowledge.
作者简介
Paul Karl Feyerabend (January 13, 1924 – February 11, 1994) was an Austrian-born philosopher of science best known for his work as a professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he worked for three decades (1958–1989). He lived a peripatetic life, living at various times in England, the United States, New Zealand, Italy, Germany, and finally Switzerland. His major works include Against Method (published in 1975), Science in a Free Society (published in 1978) and Farewell to Reason (a collection of papers published in 1987). Feyerabend became famous for his purportedly anarchistic view of science and his rejection of the existence of universal methodological rules.He is an influential figure in the philosophy of science, and also in the sociology of scientific knowledge.
目录信息
Preface to the Third Edition IX
Introduction to the Chinese Edition 1
Analytical Index 5
Introduction 9
Parts 1-20 14
Postscript on Relativism 268
Index 273
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
单单从科学发展这一目的出发，为了这一目的，方法可以被抛弃，多元主义方法论应该被采取。科学不是发现，而是创造，需要放松、美感、想象、宣传、盲信、游戏、混沌、错误。理性不能解决所有问题，这一点我深以为然。 但是我觉得科学不只是一个寻求知识增长和理论创新的活动，它...
评分传教士费耶阿本德 ——评费耶阿本德《反对方法：无政府主义知识论纲要》 许多人会认为，这是一本令人感到不适的书。在西方社会中，科学家和教育工作者也许对它咬牙切齿；而在中国，本书中鼓吹50年代中国政府毁灭科学的...
评分传教士费耶阿本德 ——评费耶阿本德《反对方法：无政府主义知识论纲要》 许多人会认为，这是一本令人感到不适的书。在西方社会中，科学家和教育工作者也许对它咬牙切齿；而在中国，本书中鼓吹50年代中国政府毁灭科学的...
评分传教士费耶阿本德 ——评费耶阿本德《反对方法：无政府主义知识论纲要》 许多人会认为，这是一本令人感到不适的书。在西方社会中，科学家和教育工作者也许对它咬牙切齿；而在中国，本书中鼓吹50年代中国政府毁灭科学的...
评分评论其实是格雷戈里·约翰·蔡廷（Gregory John Chaitin）《证明达尔文》P27的一段话： [证明达尔文] 数学是创造性的，不是机械的；数学是生物，不是机器。数学和生物学的创造性并没有多大的不同。这一点在哲学家费耶阿本德的两本书书名中得到了很好的体现：《反对方法》和《告...
用户评价
he wrote with a intellectual and compassionate tone. I wish I could say I understand the book but unfortunately I do not.
评分Feyerabend真是个大毒舌。那种切中要害的bitchiness 实在是招人喜欢
评分he wrote with a intellectual and compassionate tone. I wish I could say I understand the book but unfortunately I do not.
评分非常大气的一本书，很喜欢。
评分作者反对波普尔学说, 认为科学不能被简单地归纳出统一的structure,rules or procedures, 科学不是只靠实证主义或reason/rationality发展到今天的. The only principle that does not inhibit progress is anything goes.作者反对罢黜百家, 独尊科学；是科学和现代思想发展到一定程度后的反思。 论述清楚；例证很值得一读。特别是关于伽利略和哥白尼革命的考证，从社会背景，学科发展水平到学者间的争论，全面翔实.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有