No one has been more influential in the contemporary practice of art history than Erwin Panofsky, yet many of his early seminal papers remain virtually unknown to art historians. As a result, Michael Ann Holly maintains, art historians today do not have access to the full range of methodological considerations and possibilities that Panofsky's thought offers, and they often remain unaware of the significant role art history played in the development of modern humanistic thought. Placing Panofsky's theoretical work first in the context of the major historical paradigms generated by Hegel, Burckhardt, and Dilthey, Holly shows how these paradigms themselves became the grounds for creative controversy among Panofsky's predecessors Riegl, Wolfflin, Warburg, and Dvorak, among others. She also discusses how Panofsky's struggle with the terms and concepts of neo-Kantianism produced in his work remarkable parallels with the philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. Finally, she evaluates Panofsky's better known and later "iconological" studies by reading them against the earlier essays and by comparing his earlier ideas with the vision that has inspired recent work in the philosophy of history, semiotics, and the philosophy of science."
-
Paperback, 272 pages
Published February 6th 2015 by Cornell University Press (first published December 1984)
Original Title: Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History
ISBN: 0801498961 (ISBN13: 9780801498961)
Edition Language: English
-
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/724251.Panofsky_and_the_Foundations_of_Art_History
评分
评分
评分
评分
requires re-reading at a later date, perhaps in conjunction with Podro and et cetera.
评分是本好书。让我兢兢战战地通读过后明白了两点:对panofsky理论的理解远没有自己想象的那样深入;第二点,正是因为如此,对之的运用没有夸张到过度阐释的地步,大体上样子还过得去。
评分valuable but by no means exhaustive, the later chapters lose clarity and focus at the expense of a limited presentist/80s theoretical agenda, which disaffected Preziosi at the time, and is no longer convincing now; for Perspective essay, Wood's intro is more helpful; for relation with Cassirer/NeoKantianism, a broader intellectual context is needed
评分面对图像时代,我们越来越有必要重拾大潘神的理论武器了。德玛西亚!
评分是本好书。让我兢兢战战地通读过后明白了两点:对panofsky理论的理解远没有自己想象的那样深入;第二点,正是因为如此,对之的运用没有夸张到过度阐释的地步,大体上样子还过得去。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有