史蒂文·夏平（Steven Shapin,1943-），當代著名科學知識社會學傢、科學史傢。愛丁堡學派的主要成員之一。曆任英國愛丁堡大學科學研究部講師、高級講師，加州大學聖地亞哥分校社會學教授，哈佛大學科學史教授。代錶作有《利維坦與空氣泵：霍布斯、玻意耳與實驗生活》（1985）、《真理的社會史：十七世紀英格蘭的文明與科學》（1994）以及《科學革命》（1996）。

西濛·謝弗（Simon Schaffer, 1955-），劍橋大學科學史與科學哲學教授，劍橋大學達爾文學院研究員，曾執教於倫敦大學帝國理工學院、加州大學洛杉磯分校，閤著有《利用實驗：對自然科學的研究》（1989）、《啓濛歐洲的科學》（1999）等。

In the aftermath of the English Civil War, as people were groping for new forms of political order, Robert Boyle built an air-pump to do exper-iments. Does the story of Roundheads and Restoration have something to do with the origins of experimental sci-ence? Schaffer and Shapin believed it does. Focusing on the debates between Boyle and his archcritic Thomas Hobbes over the air-pump, the authors proposed that "solutions to the problem of knowledge are solutions to the problem of social order." Both Boyle and Hobbes were looking for ways of establishing knowledge that did not decay into ad hominem attacks and political division. Boyle proposed the experiment as cure. He argued that facts should be manufactured by machines like the air-pump so that gentlemen could witness the experiments and produce knowledge that everyone agreed on. Hobbes, by contrast, looked for natural law and viewed experiments as the artificial, unreliable products of an exclusive guild. The new approaches taken in Leviathan and the Air-Pump have been enormously influential on historical studies of science. Shapin and Schaffer found a moment of scientific revolution and showed how key scientific givens--facts, interpretations, experiment, truth--were fundamental to a new political order. Shapin and Schaffer were also innovative in their ethnographic approach. Attempting to understand the work habits, rituals, and social structures of a remote, unfamiliar group, they argued that politics were tied up in what scientists did, rather than what they said.