On October 25, 1946, in a crowded room in Cambridge, England, the great twentieth-century philosophers Ludwig Wittgenstein and Karl Popper came face to face for the first and only time. The meeting -- which lasted ten minutes -- did not go well. Their loud and aggressive confrontation became the stuff of instant legend, but precisely what happened during that brief confrontation remained for decades the subject of intense disagreement. An engaging mix of philosophy, history, biography, and literary detection, Wittgenstein's Poker explores, through the Popper/Wittgenstein confrontation, the history of philosophy in the twentieth century. It evokes the tumult of fin-de-siécle Vienna, Wittgentein's and Popper's birthplace; the tragedy of the Nazi takeover of Austria; and postwar Cambridge University, with its eccentric set of philosophy dons, including Bertrand Russell. At the center of the story stand the two giants of philosophy themselves -- proud, irascible, larger than life -- and spoiling for a fight.
Link: http://jiong.wykehamist.com/blog/2007/05/blog-post.html 佛洛依德曾经说过,我们可以把这个世界上的所有人分为两类:一类是把一切都看得比真相简单的,另一类则是把一切看得都比真相复杂的。 再也没有可能找到一对比路德维希•维特根斯坦(Ludwig Wittgenstein)...
评分其实纯粹是冲着副标题上赫然写着的“两个大哲学家十分钟争吵的故事”去看的,而书中轻描淡写的过了。 作者更倾向于按历史角度写一部客观公正的八卦,正因为如此,此书变成了一部记录了一整个时代的史书和启蒙型书籍:近代科学史,维也纳小组,剑桥,反犹,世界大战,文明中心...
评分我重点读了一次大战后维也纳的排犹风暴。增长了不少历史知识。 对于哲学争论,并没有太仔细看。 维特根斯坦的贵族出身决定了他对出身低贱的人有天生的偏见,比如波普,魏斯曼。波普虽然出身富有的律师家庭,但在维特根斯坦眼中仍属于下层社会。 这本书关于拨火棍事件的还原还...
评分关于Wittgenstein, Russell, Popper的哲学辩论,写得像是侦探小说一样,看着很过瘾.
评分去资料室找弗雷格的资料却无意间在书架上发现了找了好久的《维特根斯坦的拨火棍》。想读它的原因十分直接,我是W的迷恋者。 要说《拨火棍》的作者是记者是个大好事,记者让我想起了狗仔,狗仔让我想起了八卦,八卦让我想起了W打喷嚏的样子,显然,这本书那么有趣就是因为它知...
egregiously mean-spirited (towards popper)
评分我想我大概永远不会去把这本书读完了 :)
评分我想我大概永远不会去把这本书读完了 :)
评分我想我大概永远不会去把这本书读完了 :)
评分egregiously mean-spirited (towards popper)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有