洞穴奇案的十四種判決

洞穴奇案的十四種判決 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

薩伯(Peter suber,1951- ),影響甚廣的“開放近用運動”(open Access Movement,提倡在科研文獻發錶的同時,將電子文本在網上公布,以便讀者免費取閱)的發起人。1973年畢業於美國葉爾漢姆學院,1978年獲西北大學哲學博士學位。長期擔任葉爾漢姆學院哲學教授,也講授法律、計算機等其他課程。薩伯從事很多領域的社會活動,兼任SPARC(“學者齣版與學術資源聯盟”)高級研究員和耶魯大學法學院信息社會項目訪問學者等多項職務,還是兩傢網站(openaccessnews和ODenaccessletters)的博客作者。1991年齣版專著《自我修正的悖論》。

出版者:商務印書館(香港)有限公司
作者:薩伯(Peter Suber)
出品人:
頁數:0
译者:陳福勇
出版時間:2006
價格:0
裝幀:
isbn號碼:9789620763601
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 法律 
  • 法學 
  • 哲學 
  • 法理學 
  • 道德 
  • 法理 
  • 洞穴奇案的十四種判決 
  • 美國 
  •  
想要找書就要到 圖書目錄大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Lon Fuller?s Case of the Speluncean Exp/ ~rers is the greatest fictitious legal case of all

time. That is saying a lot, for it has some stiff competition. While its competitors

may outdo it in courtroom drama, character development, or investigative

suspense, none matches it in legal depth or dialectical agility It shows not what

makes some lawyer?s caseload interesting, but what makes law itself interesting. It

would not make a good movie; it is all ?talking heads.? In fact, the parts that

would make a good movie - the events within the cave - are over and done with

by the time Fuller begins his piece. Moreover, these events are not depicted with

cinematic vivacity, but described after the fact with judicial precision and bland-

ness.

Fuller?s live Supreme Court justices tranquilly but rigorously show the

complexity of the facts and the flexibility of legal reasoning. The live opinions

focus on different factual details and legal precedents, and lit them into different

background structures of legal and political principle. By these means Fuller

crystallizes important conflicts of principle and illustrates the major schools of

legal philosophy in his day. Fuller?s case has been called ?a classic in jurispru-

dence,? ? a microcosm of this century?s debates,? and a ?breathtaking intellectual

accomplishment.?*

Although only half a century separates us from the date of Fuller?s essay, the

legal landscape has changed profoundly. I have written nine new judicial opin-

ions on his case, with roughly Fuller?s own objectives in view, hoping to explore

important issues of principle and in the process to bring the depiction of legal

philosophy up to date.

While I would like to depict the major schools of legal philosophy today,

giving each its due, there are a few obstacles that subtly constrain the project.

Suber, Peter. Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions.

Florence, KY, USA: Routledge, 1998. p ix.

http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cityu/Doc?id=2003075&ppg=9

Copyright ? 1998. Routledge. All rights reserved.

Preface

Introduction 1

Pt. I Lon Fuller's Case of the Speluncean Explorers 5

Opinion of Chief Justice Truepenny 7

Opinion of Justice Foster 10

Opinion of Justice Tatting 15

Opinion of Justice Keen 20

Opinion of Justice Handy 25

Opinion of Justice Tatting 31

Postscript 32

Pt. II Nine New Opinions 33

Opinion of Chief Justice Burnham 35

Opinion of Justice Springham 45

Opinion of Justice Tally 57

Opinion of Justice Hellen 64

Opinion of Justice Trumpet 73

Opinion of Justice Goad 79

Opinion of Justice Frank 89

Opinion of Justice Reckon 91

Opinion of Justice Bond 99

Index 108

具體描述

讀後感

評分

首先,当面对着一个如此复杂和矛盾的案件时,我完全同意弗兰克法官的观点,即所有依靠不甚精确甚至自相矛盾的法律条文来断定被告有罪或无罪的的判决结果统统都不过是法律语言包装之下的个人意见。如果单单在法理上就既有诸如“故意杀人”和“有意杀人”此类的争执,又有“免责...  

評分

这几天看了阿加莎的无人生还,虽然是第一次看但是总觉得似曾相识,一查原来是小时候在九十年代看过一部根据此书改编的电视剧叫绿岛。情节是有十个人被以各种的理由被邀请到一个无人的小岛上度假,第一天晚上就被留声机里面的声音宣判十个人翻过这样那样的罪杀死过人,接下来...  

評分

对于法律,我是一个间歇性业余爱好者。爱好者前加上两个限定词是为了避免万一有人要和我讨论学术。我略懂法律常识,偶尔读几本法学书,主要还是喜欢法律的逻辑和思维方式。现在我打算复述几个老掉牙的案例。 第一个: 从前有一天,两个猎人去打猎,他们可能是邻居,也可能许素...  

評分

評分

对于法律,我是一个间歇性业余爱好者。爱好者前加上两个限定词是为了避免万一有人要和我讨论学术。我略懂法律常识,偶尔读几本法学书,主要还是喜欢法律的逻辑和思维方式。现在我打算复述几个老掉牙的案例。 第一个: 从前有一天,两个猎人去打猎,他们可能是邻居,也可能许素...  

用戶評價

评分

引一段書友評論——如果有一天我犯瞭什麼罪……這麼講不恰當,換個說法,如果有一天我成為某件刑事案的嫌疑人或被告人,我希望我的動機不是“試圖以激烈手段為自己或他人尋求公正”,我寜願作為一個職業罪犯被審判。如果我不幸被殺,我希望凶手是個體的人,而非公器,平等或意外地喪生於個人之手,我接

评分

我判有罪

评分

刑法21條的緊急避險很實用啊,法不責人所不能,至於該案不公平的問題,民法領域貌似有一條『契約自由』原則,但畢竟有罪與否還是得取決於那些前提假設條件的,當然,道德幷非構成殺人罪名的依據,同理,民衆意嚮亦非無罪的理由

评分

案件不算新奇瞭,探討的法理學問題倒是不錯

评分

但外行女心中仍有個疑問,就是撇開殺人這一事實和所有細節不說,人吃人這個情節,在人倫上難道不更搖搖欲墜?

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有