Daron Acemoglu is Charles P. Kindleberger Professor of Applied Economics at The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a member of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research's Program on Institutions, Organizations, and Growth. He received the 2005 John Bates Clark Medal awarded by the American Economic Association to the best economist working in the United States under age 40. He is the author of the textbook Introduction to Modern Economic Growth and coeditor of Econometrica and NBER Macroannual.
James A. Robinson is Professor of Government at Harvard University. He is a Faculty Associate at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science and the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs and is a member of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research's Program on Institutions, Organizations, and Growth. He is coeditor with Jared Diamond of Natural Experiments in History (2009).
What forces lead to democracy's creation? Why does it sometimes consolidate only to collapse at other times? Written by two of the foremost authorities on this subject in the world, this volume develops a framework for analyzing the creation and consolidation of democracy. It revolutionizes scholarship on the factors underlying government and popular movements toward democracy or dictatorship. Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson argue that different social groups prefer different political institutions because of the way they allocate political power and resources. Their book, the subject of a four-day seminar at Harvard's Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences, was also the basis for the Walras-Bowley lecture at the joint meetings of the European Economic Association and Econometric Society in 2003 and is the winner of the John Bates Clark Medal.
Daron Acemoglu在这本书中其实就是要说,经济对民主很重要,经济为民主的产生提出了一个机制。政治学和经济学的根本区别是,政治学是研究冲突的学科,这就与经济学的分析方法矛盾。而Acemoglu在这里,从人的选择出发,研究了在什么时候和在什么条件下,独裁、民主、镇压、让步...
评分民主出现的可能性—由权贵和民众间的博弈成本决定的。 本质上是一种对未来权力分配的可信承诺。 民主—制度—民众拥有的政治权利达到高峰,权贵的政策让步又不可信的情况下出现。 影响民主化和民主化巩固的重要因素—经济不平等,权贵的收入来源,全球化 核心观点:民主是一种...
评分 评分Daron Acemoglu在这本书中其实就是要说,经济对民主很重要,经济为民主的产生提出了一个机制。政治学和经济学的根本区别是,政治学是研究冲突的学科,这就与经济学的分析方法矛盾。而Acemoglu在这里,从人的选择出发,研究了在什么时候和在什么条件下,独裁、民主、镇压、让步...
阿西莫格鲁的贡献不小,起码在对民主的定义上,他就破除了对亨廷顿的迷信,找回了熊彼特。接着把民主的经济根源纳入到超越策略或结构二分的博弈论框架,对民主化和民主巩固做国别对比探究。英国、阿根廷、新加坡和南非选的极有代表性,虽然是一部致敬巴林顿 摩尔的作品,但也在某种程度上“光复”了马克思主义的经济分析,虽然马克思在《批判序言》里说历史动力到市民社会中去找。不过他的分析架构到底是奥卡姆剃刀式的简单化的,最后还是一种“深刻的片面”。
评分Acemoglu 实在是太厉害了!!我非常佩服他
评分基本上就是一本解Markov Perfect Equilibrium的书。建模思想很简单但是结论很强大。
评分role of political power (de jure vs de facto) and role of political institutions in allocating future political power; nature of poli- and eco- structure, structure of economy, collective-action, cost and benefit; social conflict as main driving force that leads to different in political institutions.
评分阿西莫格鲁的贡献不小,起码在对民主的定义上,他就破除了对亨廷顿的迷信,找回了熊彼特。接着把民主的经济根源纳入到超越策略或结构二分的博弈论框架,对民主化和民主巩固做国别对比探究。英国、阿根廷、新加坡和南非选的极有代表性,虽然是一部致敬巴林顿 摩尔的作品,但也在某种程度上“光复”了马克思主义的经济分析,虽然马克思在《批判序言》里说历史动力到市民社会中去找。不过他的分析架构到底是奥卡姆剃刀式的简单化的,最后还是一种“深刻的片面”。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有