Scanlon offers a sharp challenge to much contemporary moral philosophy. Most philosophers think that agreements between people play only a subsidiary role in moral theory. What is right or wrong is independent of what people accept. Agreements rest on morality; they do not underlie it. Scanlon dissents. In his conception, morality depends on principles it would not be reasonable for people to reject. These agreements do not derive from further moral facts. Scanlon also challenges the view that desires give reasons for action, leveling heavy artillery at the contrary position of Bernard Williams. The originality, scope, and careful argument of this work mark it as an indispensable book.
【在《正义论》中,Rawls更多地将契约论和原初状态理解为一种代表性的工具(representative device),即澄清既定的深思熟虑的道德判断的一种手段,而非某种独立的道德观念的源泉。因为罗尔斯主要关注的是应用于公共领域和社会基本结构的实质性的正义原则,他对契约论的虚置情有...
评分One-to-One Thomas Nagel What We Owe to Each Other by T.M. Scanlon Harvard, 480 pp, £21.95, February 1999, ISBN 0 674 95089 5 On occasion we are faced with acute moral choices – whether to join the Resistance or stay at home and care for our widowed...
评分【在《正义论》中,Rawls更多地将契约论和原初状态理解为一种代表性的工具(representative device),即澄清既定的深思熟虑的道德判断的一种手段,而非某种独立的道德观念的源泉。因为罗尔斯主要关注的是应用于公共领域和社会基本结构的实质性的正义原则,他对契约论的虚置情有...
评分suppose, a motive exists in any conduct, including donation. The donee's acceptance is an interest for a donor. he elicits the donee's admission that accepting this gift is desirable. acceptance thus has representative value. meanwhile, it has symbolic valu...
评分【在《正义论》中,Rawls更多地将契约论和原初状态理解为一种代表性的工具(representative device),即澄清既定的深思熟虑的道德判断的一种手段,而非某种独立的道德观念的源泉。因为罗尔斯主要关注的是应用于公共领域和社会基本结构的实质性的正义原则,他对契约论的虚置情有...
good good good!!!
评分非常根本、非常清晰,偶尔有些啰嗦,有些不够锐利。
评分感觉所有的研究,都始于motivation outside consciousness.
评分good good good!!!
评分good good good!!!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有