The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
- Chomsky
- Foucault
- 哲学
- 福柯
- 语言学
- 社会理论
- 乔姆斯基
- 思想
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
具体描述
读后感
碰到跟福柯有关的书总是想唠叨两笔，也不知为什么。 这个辩论很早在youtube就传得很火，现在终于整理出了文字版，方便大家阅读。书的篇幅不长，两个小时读完足矣，不过内容却讨论的是社会科学乃至哲学的一些基本问题。所以我觉得这本书不要叫目前这个标题，还是应该叫原先那个...
评分此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象和比喻用以解释，而福柯这家伙学理性的话语缜密而透彻，丝毫不用多说，一点点就已经...
评分莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象...
评分1、民主社会的理想是好人的理想还是所有人的理想？2、现实在理论面前是狭隘的，还是理论在现实面前是狭隘的？3、哲学理想更漫无边际，还是政治理想更漫无边际？4、战争是人性的悲剧，却是历史的重要环节。5、看来中国的大同社会还太不为欧洲人所了解。最美好，也最接近现实的最...
评分莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔...
用户评价
著名的“世纪辩论”实在是出人意料的温和。乔姆斯基的思路还是唯理主义那一套，福柯的思路倒是很结构主义。倒也没有谁完胜谁，一个人完全可以在理解福柯的怀疑主义的情况下欣赏乔姆斯基的行动意志。
评分原来这个我没有标过（。
评分赫赫，卖萌。 乔姆斯基在这里就是纳伊夫的代言人。。。福柯就自顾自卖萌
评分从这本书37页最后一段“let's begin by referring to something that we have already discussed …”开始，对照着网上的视频看
评分这两个人，相当的萌啊。还有Said，你是不是Foucault的Fan啊~~= =||||
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有