The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- Chomsky
- Foucault
- 哲学
- 福柯
- 语言学
- 社会理论
- 乔姆斯基
- 思想
- Chomsky Foucault debate
- linguistics philosophy
- power knowledge
- language structure
- critical theory
- academic discourse
- political philosophy
- structuralism
- discourse analysis
- sovereignty
具体描述
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
作者简介
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
目录信息
读后感
碰到跟福柯有关的书总是想唠叨两笔，也不知为什么。 这个辩论很早在youtube就传得很火，现在终于整理出了文字版，方便大家阅读。书的篇幅不长，两个小时读完足矣，不过内容却讨论的是社会科学乃至哲学的一些基本问题。所以我觉得这本书不要叫目前这个标题，还是应该叫原先那个...
评分看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书，谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价，原书见第六章，p266&p268： 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少，大概很少很少，但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家（可能因为我们同一天生日，他就在我心里比较特别，哈哈）；在...
评分名学者的对话或者论辩，一向容易引起人的兴趣，因是思想的交锋，大师的对弈，无须第三者来阐释双方，直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会，四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论，听者之众，传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...
评分七十年代早期的时候，荷兰的一家公共电视台曾经做过一系列的知识分子对谈的电视节目，邀请有时候是意见相近，有时候观点完全相左的著名知识分子就一个固定的论题展开讨论。本书所记录的乔姆斯基和福科的讨论正是这一些列访谈节目中的一期，时间是1971年。 乔姆斯基那时候正是...
评分此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象和比喻用以解释，而福柯这家伙学理性的话语缜密而透彻，丝毫不用多说，一点点就已经...
用户评价
这说的就是被别人完爆了还不自知继续blablabla……鸡同鸭讲
评分这说的就是被别人完爆了还不自知继续blablabla……鸡同鸭讲
评分乔姆斯基：人性.. 福柯：没有人性。 C：要去中心化 .. F：醒醒吧没有人性这种东西。C：要战斗 .. F：但是你知道并没有人性 C：为了公义 .. F：不可能的因为没有人性 ..
评分著名的“世纪辩论”实在是出人意料的温和。乔姆斯基的思路还是唯理主义那一套，福柯的思路倒是很结构主义。倒也没有谁完胜谁，一个人完全可以在理解福柯的怀疑主义的情况下欣赏乔姆斯基的行动意志。
评分A debate of the century.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有