The Chomsky-Foucault Debate

The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.

John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.

出版者:New Press, The
作者:Noam Chomsky
出品人:
页数:213
译者:
出版时间:2006-9-1
价格:USD 15.95
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9781595581341
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • Chomsky 
  • Foucault 
  • 哲学 
  • 福柯 
  • 语言学 
  • 社会理论 
  • 乔姆斯基 
  • 思想 
  •  
想要找书就要到 图书目录大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.

In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?

The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.

In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.

具体描述

读后感

评分

莫尤      【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评,偶然看到,纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】       此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物,根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述,“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”,这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一,乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔...  

评分

碰到跟福柯有关的书总是想唠叨两笔,也不知为什么。 这个辩论很早在youtube就传得很火,现在终于整理出了文字版,方便大家阅读。书的篇幅不长,两个小时读完足矣,不过内容却讨论的是社会科学乃至哲学的一些基本问题。所以我觉得这本书不要叫目前这个标题,还是应该叫原先那个...  

评分

碰到跟福柯有关的书总是想唠叨两笔,也不知为什么。 这个辩论很早在youtube就传得很火,现在终于整理出了文字版,方便大家阅读。书的篇幅不长,两个小时读完足矣,不过内容却讨论的是社会科学乃至哲学的一些基本问题。所以我觉得这本书不要叫目前这个标题,还是应该叫原先那个...  

评分

莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评,偶然看到,纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物,根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述,“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”,这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一,乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝,时而蹦出些想象...  

评分

刚看完《乔姆斯基、福柯论辩录》,很久没有缓过劲来,里面说的很多问题,就是前几日与老师的讨论的话题。其实我的内心是站在乔姆斯基这边,对人性有着深刻的理解和认同,我们的学习方式并没有那么精确,是通过我们自身的图式来学习的,比如孩子学习语言,个人独创性及创造力,...  

用户评价

评分

Plato和Aristotle永远在辩论:上一个时代他们的化名是Chomsky和Foucault,在更久远的过去他们曾自称Bernard Shaw和G.K.Chesterton。而我总是倾向于支持后者。

评分

20世纪前半叶结构语言学成为显学 乔姆斯基以其为靶子 而当结构主义扩散后 福柯以之为武器批判科技史中的主观导向。所以二人都是对的 人类现象就是充满线索而又无法预测

评分

从这本书37页最后一段“let's begin by referring to something that we have already discussed …”开始,对照着网上的视频看

评分

赫赫,卖萌。 乔姆斯基在这里就是纳伊夫的代言人。。。福柯就自顾自卖萌

评分

著名的“世纪辩论”实在是出人意料的温和。乔姆斯基的思路还是唯理主义那一套,福柯的思路倒是很结构主义。倒也没有谁完胜谁,一个人完全可以在理解福柯的怀疑主义的情况下欣赏乔姆斯基的行动意志。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有