具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
评分
两个法系的思考方法基本一致
评分跳读的 可能上学了还要再读一遍
评分可惜做起来是另外一回事
评分跳读的 可能上学了还要再读一遍
评分to show you how the extremely oversimplified versions of these positions that beginngers frequently espouse — that is, “naive” formalism (the rulebook account) and “vulgar” realism (the judge as loose cannon) — can undermine your capacity to make persuasive legal arguments and, with it, your ability to excel on law school exams.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有