No philosopher has held a higher opinion of art than Hegel, yet nor was any so profoundly pessimistic about its prospects despite living in the German golden age of Goethe, Mozart and Schiller. For if the artists of classical Greece could find the perfect fusion of content and form, modernity faced complicating and ultimately disabling questions. Christianity, with its code of unworldliness, had compromised the immediacy of man's relationship with reality, and ironic detachment had alienated him from his deepest feelings. Hegel's "Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics" were delivered in Berlin in the 1820s and stand today as a passionately argued work that challenged the ability of art to respond to the modern world.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
我还是不太懂hegel为什么要彻底否认affective/emotional arousal的部分。如果借助master-slave dialectics, 为什么不能有更 complex sensory/affective/emotional arousal that manifests the inner-outward reconciliation/struggle?
评分NTU哲學所Hegel's Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics[黑格爾美學講演錄導論] 指定教材
评分https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ae/
评分我还是不太懂hegel为什么要彻底否认affective/emotional arousal的部分。如果借助master-slave dialectics, 为什么不能有更 complex sensory/affective/emotional arousal that manifests the inner-outward reconciliation/struggle?
评分我还是不太懂hegel为什么要彻底否认affective/emotional arousal的部分。如果借助master-slave dialectics, 为什么不能有更 complex sensory/affective/emotional arousal that manifests the inner-outward reconciliation/struggle?
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有