Margaret Jacob and Larry Stewart examine the profound transformation that began in 1687. From the year when Newton published his "Principia" to the Crystal Palace Exhibition of 1851, science gradually became central to Western thought and economic development. The book aims at a general audience and examines how, despite powerful opposition on the Continent, a Newtonian understanding gained acceptance and practical application. By the mid-eighteenth century the new science had achieved ascendancy, and the race was on to apply Newtonian mechanics to industry and manufacturing. They end the story with the temple to scientific and technological progress that was the Crystal Palace exhibition. Choosing their examples carefully, Jacob and Stewart show that there was nothing preordained or inevitable about the centrality awarded to science. "It is easy to forget that science might have been stillborn, or remained the esoteric knowledge of court elites. Instead, for better and for worse, science became a centerpiece of Western culture."
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
將現代科學（理論）的誕生與工業革命的産生聯係起來雖然不能說錯，但多少帶有瞭目的論（teleology）性質——從知識的總結到實踐的檢驗再到文化的形成，雖然每一層級的（嚮下）推進都需要堅實的科學理論與社會與生産實踐作為基礎，而帶來質變的發展卻可能是一些偶然與靈感作祟
评分將現代科學（理論）的誕生與工業革命的産生聯係起來雖然不能說錯，但多少帶有瞭目的論（teleology）性質——從知識的總結到實踐的檢驗再到文化的形成，雖然每一層級的（嚮下）推進都需要堅實的科學理論與社會與生産實踐作為基礎，而帶來質變的發展卻可能是一些偶然與靈感作祟
评分將現代科學（理論）的誕生與工業革命的産生聯係起來雖然不能說錯，但多少帶有瞭目的論（teleology）性質——從知識的總結到實踐的檢驗再到文化的形成，雖然每一層級的（嚮下）推進都需要堅實的科學理論與社會與生産實踐作為基礎，而帶來質變的發展卻可能是一些偶然與靈感作祟
评分將現代科學（理論）的誕生與工業革命的産生聯係起來雖然不能說錯，但多少帶有瞭目的論（teleology）性質——從知識的總結到實踐的檢驗再到文化的形成，雖然每一層級的（嚮下）推進都需要堅實的科學理論與社會與生産實踐作為基礎，而帶來質變的發展卻可能是一些偶然與靈感作祟
评分將現代科學（理論）的誕生與工業革命的産生聯係起來雖然不能說錯，但多少帶有瞭目的論（teleology）性質——從知識的總結到實踐的檢驗再到文化的形成，雖然每一層級的（嚮下）推進都需要堅實的科學理論與社會與生産實踐作為基礎，而帶來質變的發展卻可能是一些偶然與靈感作祟
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有