From Library Journal
While this work of literary theory, which first appeared in Japanese in 1980, concentrates on the literature and thought of the 1980s, it challenges readers to reinterpret the literature of the entire Meiji Period (1868-1926) in six discrete essays plus a forward by Frederick Jameson and materials added for the English and paperback editions. Karatani (literature, Hosei Univ.) is at his most provocative when discussing the "discovery" of landscape in painting and literature as well as of the child as a human being. In his examinations of such important Meiji writers as Soseki, Kunidida Doppo, Tayama Katai, and Tsubouchi Shoyo, he offers insightful cultural criticism of subjects such as ethnography, religion, language, and modernity in the West and East. This far-reaching and bold reconsideration of Japanese literary history can be appreciated by scholars of modern thought and literature, above all those versed in Japanese studies.
- D.E. Perushek, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Review
“Karatani Kojin’s Origins of Modern Japanese Literature (Nihon Kindai bungaku no kigen) has had a profound effect on the way we formulate the questions we ask about modern literature and culture, and that effect will no doubt be redoubled now that the work is available in a lucid (and carefully annotated) English translation. . . . Karatani’s argument is compelling, moving even, and in the end the reader comes away with a different understanding not only of modern Japanese literature but of modern Japan itself. . .”
--Stephen Snyder, The Journal of Asian Studies
原先是导师复印的第一章,《风景的发现》,啃的是原版,很累,通读了四五遍。果真应验了智商是硬伤的话。大神的2个观点只能勉强讲出一个容易的来,将绘画中的透视法山水画导入文学批评中来阐明颠倒的问题实在是没有搞懂,便吱吱呼呼地扭捏半天没说出来。不过,通读全书后,感觉...
评分柄谷的行文思路是一而贯终的,所以,每一章的内容虽然有所差异,但是其本质内涵是相同的,在这里讨论“儿童”一节。首先要强调的是柄谷所说的“儿童”与孩子和“大众”与柳田国男的常民的理解,常民和孩子都是具体存在于社会中的人,而“儿童”与“大众”则是知识人为发现自我...
评分柄谷行人在《日本现代文学的起源》中提出了“倒置”这一认知模式,具体展现在的是“风景”这个现代概念的出现这一文化事件上。他认为,“风景”概念是在风景这一现象出现后才产生的,而风景现象往往从内面中被发现。如风景画则是因符合了西方的透视法这类现代认识装置,与山水...
评分柄谷的行文思路是一而贯终的,所以,每一章的内容虽然有所差异,但是其本质内涵是相同的,在这里讨论“儿童”一节。首先要强调的是柄谷所说的“儿童”与孩子和“大众”与柳田国男的常民的理解,常民和孩子都是具体存在于社会中的人,而“儿童”与“大众”则是知识人为发现自我...
评分总有那么一类人,思想惊为天人而写法拉拉杂杂,让人讨厌( 但还是希望我们都能读到柄谷行人君!இ௰இ
评分并非是一本日本文学史,在这本书中,柄谷行人试图探究日本现代文学的源头,换句话说,他试图重新审视批判我们现在习以为常的一些话语,这些因复杂的现代性而形成的常识,即是“源头”,也是问题所在。对于现代性的批判如今读来已不稀奇,但柄谷行人能够从西方哲学出发,将批判理论与日本本身的文学和历史结合(并非硬套理论),站在文学的立场上,从历史和哲学的角度出发反思日本的现代性这点上,十分出色。这就是一个头脑清楚把书读通的学者写出来的书啊!另外,也让我对疾病、现代医学批判这方面引起了兴趣。
评分并非是一本日本文学史,在这本书中,柄谷行人试图探究日本现代文学的源头,换句话说,他试图重新审视批判我们现在习以为常的一些话语,这些因复杂的现代性而形成的常识,即是“源头”,也是问题所在。对于现代性的批判如今读来已不稀奇,但柄谷行人能够从西方哲学出发,将批判理论与日本本身的文学和历史结合(并非硬套理论),站在文学的立场上,从历史和哲学的角度出发反思日本的现代性这点上,十分出色。这就是一个头脑清楚把书读通的学者写出来的书啊!另外,也让我对疾病、现代医学批判这方面引起了兴趣。
评分总有那么一类人,思想惊为天人而写法拉拉杂杂,让人讨厌( 但还是希望我们都能读到柄谷行人君!இ௰இ
评分题材挺有意思,landscape真是popular topic,大概是我读惯了学术界系统写作方式,这书写得一散我就觉得理据不足的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有