Ronald Dworkin occupies a distinctive place in both public life and philosophy. In public life, he is a regular contributor to The New York Review of Books and other widely read journals. In philosophy, he has written important and influential works on many of the most prominent issues in legal and political philosophy. In both cases, his interventions have in part shaped the debates he joined. His opposition to Robert Bork's nomination for the United States Supreme Court gave new centrality to debates about the public role of judges and the role of original intent in constitutional interpretation. His writings in legal philosophy have reoriented the modern debate about legal positivism and natural law. In political philosophy, he has shaped the ways in which people debate the nature of equality and has reframed debates about the sanctity of life.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
精读了Shapiro的名篇，他认为实证主义的困境在于辨析法律立基于社会事实还是道德事实，而这彻底放弃了德沃金反本质主义的立场。而要贯彻德沃金法律哲学的意图，需要将德沃金理论移植入建构主义基础上。
评分精读了Shapiro的名篇，他认为实证主义的困境在于辨析法律立基于社会事实还是道德事实，而这彻底放弃了德沃金反本质主义的立场。而要贯彻德沃金法律哲学的意图，需要将德沃金理论移植入建构主义基础上。
评分精读了Shapiro的名篇，他认为实证主义的困境在于辨析法律立基于社会事实还是道德事实，而这彻底放弃了德沃金反本质主义的立场。而要贯彻德沃金法律哲学的意图，需要将德沃金理论移植入建构主义基础上。
评分精读了Shapiro的名篇，他认为实证主义的困境在于辨析法律立基于社会事实还是道德事实，而这彻底放弃了德沃金反本质主义的立场。而要贯彻德沃金法律哲学的意图，需要将德沃金理论移植入建构主义基础上。
评分精读了Shapiro的名篇，他认为实证主义的困境在于辨析法律立基于社会事实还是道德事实，而这彻底放弃了德沃金反本质主义的立场。而要贯彻德沃金法律哲学的意图，需要将德沃金理论移植入建构主义基础上。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有