Civil Society under Authoritarianism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Jessica C. Teets is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department and Jeanne Epp Barksdale '48 Junior Faculty Fellow at Middlebury College, Vermont. Her research focuses on governance in authoritarian regimes - specifically the role of civil society such as non-profits, NGOs, and associations - with an emphasis on Chinese politics. She is the author, most recently, of 'Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China' (The China Quarterly, 2013) and 'Reforming Service Delivery in China: The Emergence of a Social Innovation Model' (Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2012). Dr Teets was recently selected to participate in the Public Intellectuals Program created by the National Committee on United States-China Relations.
- 政治学
- 公民社会
- 社会学
- 中国政治
- 海外中国研究
- 威权主义
- 中国
- 威权韧性
Despite the dominant narrative of the repression of civil society in China, Civil Society Under Authoritarianism: The China Model argues that interactions between local officials and civil society facilitate a learning process, whereby each actor learns about the intentions and work processes of the other. Over the past two decades, often facilitated by foreign donors and problems within the general social framework, these interactions generated a process in which officials learned the benefits and disadvantages of civil society. Civil society supports local officials' efforts to provide social services and improve public policies, yet it also engages in protest and other activities that challenge social stability and development. This duality motivates local officials in China to construct a "social management" system - known as consultative authoritarianism - to encourage the beneficial aspects and discourage the dangerous ones. Although civil society has not democratized China, such organizations have facilitated greater dialogue between citizens and state as part of politics in an authoritarian system that normally lacks such channels for participation.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
consultative authoritarianism and illiberal wave，参考文献部分很多错误，差评！
评分电子书
评分1、把公民社会化约成NGO十分不可取。和社运失去联系的NGO很容易萎缩。虽然看起来很蓬勃，有时候还能递上去一点政策建议；2、夸大了CA模型的稳定性。政府管理的手段不在于设置了正反两方面的激励，而在于这些激励的标准从来都不公开透明。今天还在合法的地带，明天就整你。3、主要问题在于靶子不行。自由主义的公民社会理论本来就更偏意识形态一点，并无可观的经验研究支持。对法团主义的批判稍有价值。
评分电子书
评分结论和Spires说的几乎一样，把重点稍稍放在gov的learning process上。整体的论述在意料之中，没太多亮点。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有