Trained as an art historian but viewing architecture from the perspective of a "displaced philosopher," Hubert Damisch in these essays offers a meticulous parsing of language and structure to "think architecture in a different key," as Anthony Vidler puts it in his introduction. Drawn to architecture because it provides "an open series of structural models," Damisch examines the origin of architecture and then its structural development from the nineteenth through the twenty-first centuries. He leads the reader from Jean-Francois Blondel to Eugene Viollet-le-Duc to Mies van der Rohe to Diller + Scofidio, with stops along the way at the Temple of Jerusalem, Vitruvius's De Architectura, and the Louvre. In the title essay, Damisch moves easily from Diderot's Encylopedie to Noah's Ark (discussing the provisioning, access, floor plan) to the Pan American Building to Le Corbusier to Ground Zero. Noah's Ark marks the origin of construction, and thus of architecture itself. Diderot's Encylopedie entry on architecture followed his entry on Noah's Ark; architecture could only find its way after the Flood. In these thirteen essays, written over a span of forty years, Damisch takes on other histories and theories of architecture to trace a unique trajectory of architectural structure and thought. The essays are, as Vidler says, "a set of exercises" in thinking about architecture.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Damisch这个人实在是很好玩也很神经，说什么都煞有介事的，而且还让人觉得越看越有道理。文采又好。国内怎么没人研究他的书咧。
评分Damisch这个人实在是很好玩也很神经，说什么都煞有介事的，而且还让人觉得越看越有道理。文采又好。国内怎么没人研究他的书咧。
评分Damisch这个人实在是很好玩也很神经，说什么都煞有介事的，而且还让人觉得越看越有道理。文采又好。国内怎么没人研究他的书咧。
评分Damisch这个人实在是很好玩也很神经，说什么都煞有介事的，而且还让人觉得越看越有道理。文采又好。国内怎么没人研究他的书咧。
评分Damisch这个人实在是很好玩也很神经，说什么都煞有介事的，而且还让人觉得越看越有道理。文采又好。国内怎么没人研究他的书咧。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有