Trained as an art historian but viewing architecture from the perspective of a "displaced philosopher," Hubert Damisch in these essays offers a meticulous parsing of language and structure to "think architecture in a different key," as Anthony Vidler puts it in his introduction. Drawn to architecture because it provides "an open series of structural models," Damisch examines the origin of architecture and then its structural development from the nineteenth through the twenty-first centuries. He leads the reader from Jean-Francois Blondel to Eugene Viollet-le-Duc to Mies van der Rohe to Diller + Scofidio, with stops along the way at the Temple of Jerusalem, Vitruvius's De Architectura, and the Louvre. In the title essay, Damisch moves easily from Diderot's Encylopedie to Noah's Ark (discussing the provisioning, access, floor plan) to the Pan American Building to Le Corbusier to Ground Zero. Noah's Ark marks the origin of construction, and thus of architecture itself. Diderot's Encylopedie entry on architecture followed his entry on Noah's Ark; architecture could only find its way after the Flood. In these thirteen essays, written over a span of forty years, Damisch takes on other histories and theories of architecture to trace a unique trajectory of architectural structure and thought. The essays are, as Vidler says, "a set of exercises" in thinking about architecture.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Damisch這個人實在是很好玩也很神經，說什麼都煞有介事的，而且還讓人覺得越看越有道理。文采又好。國內怎麼沒人研究他的書咧。
评分Damisch這個人實在是很好玩也很神經，說什麼都煞有介事的，而且還讓人覺得越看越有道理。文采又好。國內怎麼沒人研究他的書咧。
评分Damisch這個人實在是很好玩也很神經，說什麼都煞有介事的，而且還讓人覺得越看越有道理。文采又好。國內怎麼沒人研究他的書咧。
评分Damisch這個人實在是很好玩也很神經，說什麼都煞有介事的，而且還讓人覺得越看越有道理。文采又好。國內怎麼沒人研究他的書咧。
评分Damisch這個人實在是很好玩也很神經，說什麼都煞有介事的，而且還讓人覺得越看越有道理。文采又好。國內怎麼沒人研究他的書咧。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有