China's Philological Turn pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Ori Sela is an associate professor in the Department of East Asian Studies at Tel Aviv University.
- 思想史
- 学术史
- 清學
- 清史
- 海外中国研究
- 英语学术类书籍
- EarlyModernChina
- 钱大昕
In eighteenth-century China, a remarkable intellectual transformation took place, centered on the ascendance of philology. Its practitio ners were preoccupied with the reliability of sources as evidence for restoring ancient texts and meanings and with the centrality of facts and truth to their scholarship and identity. With the power to construct the textual past, philology has the potential to shape both individual and collective identities, and its rise to prominence consequently deeply affected contemporaneous political, social, and cultural agendas.
Ori Sela foregrounds the polymath Qian Daxin (1728–1804), one of the most distinguished scholars of the Qing dynasty, to tell this story. China’s Philological Turn traces scholars’ social networks and the production of knowledge, considering the texts they studied along with their reading practices and the assumptions about knowledge, facts, and truth that came with them. The book considers fundamental issues of eighteenth-century intellectual life: the tension between antiquity’s elevated status and the question of what antiquity actually was; the status of scientific knowledge, especially astronomy, mathematics, and calendrical studies; and the relationship between learned debates and cultural anxieties, especially scholars’ self-characterization and collective identity. Sela brings to light manuscripts, biographies, letters, handwritten notes, epitaphs, and more to highlight the creativity and openness of his subjects. A pioneering book in the cultural history of intellectuals across disciplinary boundaries, China’s Philological Turn reconstructs the history of eighteenth-century Chinese learning and its long-lasting consequences.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
将钱大昕视之为考证学运动（确切说是“古学”）的代表人物；跟胡明辉相比，对于早期现代的看法更加审慎。
评分将钱大昕视之为考证学运动（确切说是“古学”）的代表人物；跟胡明辉相比，对于早期现代的看法更加审慎。
评分将钱大昕视之为考证学运动（确切说是“古学”）的代表人物；跟胡明辉相比，对于早期现代的看法更加审慎。
评分将钱大昕视之为考证学运动（确切说是“古学”）的代表人物；跟胡明辉相比，对于早期现代的看法更加审慎。
评分将钱大昕视之为考证学运动（确切说是“古学”）的代表人物；跟胡明辉相比，对于早期现代的看法更加审慎。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有