China's Philological Turn pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Ori Sela is an associate professor in the Department of East Asian Studies at Tel Aviv University.
- 思想史
- 學術史
- 清學
- 清史
- 海外中國研究
- 英語學術類書籍
- EarlyModernChina
- 錢大昕
In eighteenth-century China, a remarkable intellectual transformation took place, centered on the ascendance of philology. Its practitio ners were preoccupied with the reliability of sources as evidence for restoring ancient texts and meanings and with the centrality of facts and truth to their scholarship and identity. With the power to construct the textual past, philology has the potential to shape both individual and collective identities, and its rise to prominence consequently deeply affected contemporaneous political, social, and cultural agendas.
Ori Sela foregrounds the polymath Qian Daxin (1728–1804), one of the most distinguished scholars of the Qing dynasty, to tell this story. China’s Philological Turn traces scholars’ social networks and the production of knowledge, considering the texts they studied along with their reading practices and the assumptions about knowledge, facts, and truth that came with them. The book considers fundamental issues of eighteenth-century intellectual life: the tension between antiquity’s elevated status and the question of what antiquity actually was; the status of scientific knowledge, especially astronomy, mathematics, and calendrical studies; and the relationship between learned debates and cultural anxieties, especially scholars’ self-characterization and collective identity. Sela brings to light manuscripts, biographies, letters, handwritten notes, epitaphs, and more to highlight the creativity and openness of his subjects. A pioneering book in the cultural history of intellectuals across disciplinary boundaries, China’s Philological Turn reconstructs the history of eighteenth-century Chinese learning and its long-lasting consequences.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
將錢大昕視之為考證學運動（確切說是“古學”）的代錶人物；跟鬍明輝相比，對於早期現代的看法更加審慎。
评分將錢大昕視之為考證學運動（確切說是“古學”）的代錶人物；跟鬍明輝相比，對於早期現代的看法更加審慎。
评分將錢大昕視之為考證學運動（確切說是“古學”）的代錶人物；跟鬍明輝相比，對於早期現代的看法更加審慎。
评分將錢大昕視之為考證學運動（確切說是“古學”）的代錶人物；跟鬍明輝相比，對於早期現代的看法更加審慎。
评分將錢大昕視之為考證學運動（確切說是“古學”）的代錶人物；跟鬍明輝相比，對於早期現代的看法更加審慎。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有