Economists seem to be everywhere in the media these days. But what exactly do today's economists do? What and how are they taught? Updating David Colander and Arjo Klamer's classic The Making of an Economist, this book shows what is happening in elite U.S. economics Ph.D. programs. By examining these programs, Colander gives a view of cutting-edge economics--and a glimpse at its likely future. And by comparing economics education today to the findings of the original book, the new book shows how much--and in what ways--the field has changed over the past two decades. The original book led to a reexamination of graduate education by the profession, and has been essential reading for prospective graduate students. Like its predecessor, The Making of an Economist, Redux is likely to provoke discussion within economics and beyond.
The book includes new interviews with students at Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, MIT, Chicago, and Columbia. In these conversations, the students--the next generation of elite economists--colorfully and frankly describe what they think of their field and what graduate economics education is really like. The book concludes with reflections by Colander, Klamer, and Robert Solow.
This inside look at the making of economists will interest anyone who wants to better understand the economics profession. An indispensible tool for anyone thinking about graduate education in economics, this edition is complete with colorful interviews and predictions about the future of cutting-edge economics.
具體描述
讀後感
因为这本书的标题，我在读前对本书寄予了某些“不切实际”的期望，比如，能不能谈大学（经济学）学术再生产的机制、经济学学术活动与经济主体活动之间的关系（知识与权力互动）——这样的书是有，但并不是这本书。Colander很老实的就针对问卷调查进行研究，没有很花俏的理论（...
評分因为这本书的标题，我在读前对本书寄予了某些“不切实际”的期望，比如，能不能谈大学（经济学）学术再生产的机制、经济学学术活动与经济主体活动之间的关系（知识与权力互动）——这样的书是有，但并不是这本书。Colander很老实的就针对问卷调查进行研究，没有很花俏的理论（...
評分因为这本书的标题，我在读前对本书寄予了某些“不切实际”的期望，比如，能不能谈大学（经济学）学术再生产的机制、经济学学术活动与经济主体活动之间的关系（知识与权力互动）——这样的书是有，但并不是这本书。Colander很老实的就针对问卷调查进行研究，没有很花俏的理论（...
評分因为这本书的标题，我在读前对本书寄予了某些“不切实际”的期望，比如，能不能谈大学（经济学）学术再生产的机制、经济学学术活动与经济主体活动之间的关系（知识与权力互动）——这样的书是有，但并不是这本书。Colander很老实的就针对问卷调查进行研究，没有很花俏的理论（...
評分因为这本书的标题，我在读前对本书寄予了某些“不切实际”的期望，比如，能不能谈大学（经济学）学术再生产的机制、经济学学术活动与经济主体活动之间的关系（知识与权力互动）——这样的书是有，但并不是这本书。Colander很老实的就针对问卷调查进行研究，没有很花俏的理论（...
用戶評價
economics is inherently schizophrenic....
评分economics is inherently schizophrenic....
评分雖然這個主題換社會學或人類學傢就寫齣花瞭，但Colander畢竟本職還是經濟學傢，所以還是很老實按調查問捲的結果分析，評論也限製在博士生階段的學科設置問題上，隻是很謹慎的認為科係的學生篩選機製導緻一代代學生越發目光狹隘、同質化，經濟學教學脫離實際（但這種脫離實際的理論對社會産生什麼影響就不是本書的範圍瞭）。但他提齣的宏觀課程邊緣化以及主張把宏觀剔除齣core courses，卻不是一個簡單的學科問題，這背後經濟思想史的變遷很值得深究
评分economics is inherently schizophrenic....
评分It feels so differently reading this book again. Hardly impressed. Maybe once you are in, you don't care what you used to care.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有