At the heart of this classic, seminal book is Julian Jaynes's still-controversial thesis that human consciousness did not begin far back in animal evolution but instead is a learned process that came about only three thousand years ago and is still developing. The implications of this revolutionary scientific paradigm extend into virtually every aspect of our psychology, our history and culture, our religion -- and indeed our future.
If you haven't read this book, you don't really like Westworld. If you don't think it's bullshit, then I feel sorry for you. Why do I have to write 140 words. That's it.
評分If you haven't read this book, you don't really like Westworld. If you don't think it's bullshit, then I feel sorry for you. Why do I have to write 140 words. That's it.
評分If you haven't read this book, you don't really like Westworld. If you don't think it's bullshit, then I feel sorry for you. Why do I have to write 140 words. That's it.
評分If you haven't read this book, you don't really like Westworld. If you don't think it's bullshit, then I feel sorry for you. Why do I have to write 140 words. That's it.
評分If you haven't read this book, you don't really like Westworld. If you don't think it's bullshit, then I feel sorry for you. Why do I have to write 140 words. That's it.
“神明從未離去,隻是變成主觀意識”的理論很有意思,但explanatory gap太大瞭。行為主義心理研究都被吐槽,更何況從考古資料推測古人的心智結構?個人感覺作者太傾心於精神分裂的幻覺癥狀,忽略瞭精神異常狀態時可能齣現的其他癥狀,進化角度上來講,這種狀態真的利於個體生存?其他學者對該理論的批判一起讀纔算帶勁兒。不過,這本書讓我真正明白人類學如何被歸為認知科學分支。十分贊賞這種從生理構造和社會背景角度結閤起來理解宗教起源,而不是用“古人都很迷信很蠢”來迴避宗教話題。
评分讀瞭一半吧,很十九世紀末寫作風格,很有說服力,我比較相信,不過不明白和西部世界有什麼關係,沒看到意識的齣現是個小遺憾,但真沒時間看那麼長瞭
评分這樣的學術反而是為世俗所不容的。自己引用自己未發錶的文獻,真是對體製最大的諷刺,也是治學精神決絕的錶現。意識是間斷性的自我欺騙的把戲,基本上我在研究生階段到現在一直是堅信的,難得有人能跨越文明和曆史長河、學術洪流去找到入口捕捉蛛絲馬跡。讀這本,再加上馬拉美和對馬拉美的解讀,更加確信佛教的所謂禪悟、頓悟是個巨大的騙局。也許人需要這樣的騙局,但織造這樣的騙局的佛陀們必須是對此心知肚明的。
评分orz太難讀瞭
评分論如何有理有據地xjbc
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有