約翰‧阿姆斯特朗 (John Armstrong)
1966年生於英國格拉斯哥。曾任倫敦大學美學課程的研究員和主任,現任墨爾本大學哲學係副教授。著有《歌德:愛與生命》、《美的神秘力量》等作品。
带着一丝的疑惑和求解看了这本书, 其实看了两遍之后我还是看不懂, 至少是不懂 ------ “爱”这么一个感性的话题, 作者凭什么写得这么理性, 这么有条理, 另一方面来说这就是矛盾了! 不过,总体而言,还是比较推荐的~~ 对爱有问题的~
評分带着一丝的疑惑和求解看了这本书, 其实看了两遍之后我还是看不懂, 至少是不懂 ------ “爱”这么一个感性的话题, 作者凭什么写得这么理性, 这么有条理, 另一方面来说这就是矛盾了! 不过,总体而言,还是比较推荐的~~ 对爱有问题的~
評分教育普及的年代,不认识字的叫文盲;法制社会,不懂法律的叫法盲;21世纪,剩男剩女当道,有的从小学就开始早恋,谈了十几年的恋爱,换了无数了不能长久的对象,却还搞不清楚爱是什么。这样的人,可不可以被称作“爱盲”? 爱是什么?这是我们阅读这本书极想获取的答案。我们...
評分我有一个朋友,自幼花痴帅哥,对各式花样美男均无抵抗力,可她交往过的男朋友,没有一个长得好看的。感情最深的那个,甚至经常被人评价为“进化不完全”。 还有一个朋友,一直向往古诗词里描述的那种古典爱情,可到头来却找了个意大利男朋友,两人用操着各自国家口音的...
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有