约翰‧阿姆斯特朗 (John Armstrong)
1966年生于英国格拉斯哥。曾任伦敦大学美学课程的研究员和主任,现任墨尔本大学哲学系副教授。著有《歌德:爱与生命》、《美的神秘力量》等作品。
还没看过这本书,但从 http://www.yesasia.com/global/愛情的條件-親密關係的哲學/1020122674-0-0-0-zh_TW/info.html 这里的介绍,能看到一点内容的梗概。
评分我有一个朋友,自幼花痴帅哥,对各式花样美男均无抵抗力,可她交往过的男朋友,没有一个长得好看的。感情最深的那个,甚至经常被人评价为“进化不完全”。 还有一个朋友,一直向往古诗词里描述的那种古典爱情,可到头来却找了个意大利男朋友,两人用操着各自国家口音的...
评分文/陶思璇 某天,某校,某教室,一群成年男女坐在一起,等待着一堂特别的实验课:关于爱。 走进来的是一位文学评论家,引经据典地讲述了文学作品对于爱的描写和总结,以及推动。 台下的人听得热血沸腾。文学作品总是能够让人沉浸其中,把故事中的人物经历与自己的经历相比较,...
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有