约翰‧阿姆斯特朗 (John Armstrong)
1966年生于英国格拉斯哥。曾任伦敦大学美学课程的研究员和主任,现任墨尔本大学哲学系副教授。著有《歌德:爱与生命》、《美的神秘力量》等作品。
教育普及的年代,不认识字的叫文盲;法制社会,不懂法律的叫法盲;21世纪,剩男剩女当道,有的从小学就开始早恋,谈了十几年的恋爱,换了无数了不能长久的对象,却还搞不清楚爱是什么。这样的人,可不可以被称作“爱盲”? 爱是什么?这是我们阅读这本书极想获取的答案。我们...
评分 评分文/陶思璇 某天,某校,某教室,一群成年男女坐在一起,等待着一堂特别的实验课:关于爱。 走进来的是一位文学评论家,引经据典地讲述了文学作品对于爱的描写和总结,以及推动。 台下的人听得热血沸腾。文学作品总是能够让人沉浸其中,把故事中的人物经历与自己的经历相比较,...
评分说实话这本书我没有重头到尾地看,也不知道当初为什么看这本书,或许里面有一句话值得参考也仅仅是这句话。大概意思是这样吧,你喜欢的这个人或许你并不是喜欢他,你只是喜欢的人完美的倒影折射在他身上,一切活在你的想象中,当然也就喜欢了!其它的没什么好说的了,全部都是...
评分说实话这本书我没有重头到尾地看,也不知道当初为什么看这本书,或许里面有一句话值得参考也仅仅是这句话。大概意思是这样吧,你喜欢的这个人或许你并不是喜欢他,你只是喜欢的人完美的倒影折射在他身上,一切活在你的想象中,当然也就喜欢了!其它的没什么好说的了,全部都是...
The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.
评分The worst kind of pseudo-philosophical writing. As a coffee table book, it is hopelessly dry and boring. As a study of the subject in question, its spurious arguments and incoherent verbiage don't even stand a casual examination.