Creating the Intellectual pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Eddy U is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Davis. He is the author of Disorganizing China: Counter-Bureaucracy and the Decline of Socialism.

出版者:University of California Press

作者:Eddy U

出品人:

頁數:248

译者:

出版時間:2019-5-14

價格:USD 34.95

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780520303690

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

知識分子
曆史
政治學
海外中國研究
知識分子
曆史學
中國近代史
中共黨史

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到圖書目錄大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Creating the Intellectual redefines how we understand relations between intellectuals and the Chinese socialist revolution of the last century. Under the Chinese Communist Party, “the intellectual” was first and foremost a widening classification of individuals based on Marxist thought. The party turned revolutionaries and otherwise ordinary people into subjects identified as usable but untrustworthy intellectuals, an identification that profoundly affected patterns of domination, interaction, and rupture within the revolutionary enterprise. Drawing on a wide range of data, Eddy U takes the reader on a journey that examines political discourses, revolutionary strategies, rural activities, urban registrations, workplace arrangements, organized protests, and theater productions. He lays out in colorful detail the formation of new identities, forms of organization, and associations in Chinese society. The outcome is a compelling picture of the mutual constitution of the intellectual and the Chinese socialist revolution, the legacy of which still affects ways of seeing, thinking, acting, and feeling in what is now a globalized China.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

挺失望的，原本以為會收獲一些理論insights，結果新瓶舊酒都稱不上——他對社會分類理論的認識和討論都太基礎瞭（看reference就知道）。而且整個書就是個論文集，很多章節雖然能看齣來他重寫瞭一些地方，試圖reframe成和分類的文獻相關的討論，但實際上材料根本沒在討論知識分子as a classification, but still a group of people……具體的被分類雨分類的互動，分類的arbitrary啥的根本沒咋涉及。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

一邊說“知識分子”是一種社會分類，一邊強調分類的邊界是模糊而變動的，結果就是作者自己的觀點本身左右互搏，最大的結論也很無力。唯一比較新的觀點是黨委負責製、思想教育、群眾監督三種體製都是為瞭應對知識分子問題而生的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

重讀瞭一遍。也是自成一傢之言瞭。

评分☆☆☆☆☆