Can a democratic society treat all its members as equals and also recognize their specific cultural identities? Should it try to ensure the survival of specific cultural groups? Is political recognition of ethnicity or gender essential to a person's dignity? These are some of the questions at the heart of the political controversy over multiculturalism and recognition--a debate that has raged across academic departments, university campuses, ethnic and feminist associations, and governments throughout the world. In this book Charles Taylor offers a historically informed, philosophical perspective on what is at stake in the demand made by many people for recognition of their particular group identities by public institutions. His thoughts serve as a point of departure for commentaries by other leading thinkers, who further relate the demand for recognition to issues of multicultural education, feminism, and cultural separatism. In his essay Taylor compares two competing forms of liberal government: one that protects no particular culture but ensures the rights and welfare of all its citizens, and one that nurtures a particular culture yet also protects the basic rights and welfare of nonconforming citizens. Questioning the desirability and possibility of the first conception, Taylor defends a version of the second. In response Steven Rockefeller warns against the ascendancy of particularist cultural identities over the universal identity of democratic citizens. Michael Walzer defends a liberalism that authorizes democratic citizens to adapt their politics to varying situations, and suggests that a culturally neutral politics best suits the United States. Proposing an alternative perspective to Taylor's presumption of value in foreign cultures, Susan Wolf identifies the demand for multicultural education with an accurate understanding of who "we" Americans are. Amy Gutmann focuses on the debate over multiculturalism and free speech on university campuses, arguing that the demands of liberal democratic education are far greater than either essentialists or deconstructionists commonly recognize. Multiculturalism and "The Politics of Recognition" will stimulate constructive discussion and enlighten public discourse on the difficult issues surrounding multiculturalism. The volume is based on the Inaugural Lecture for the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University, founded in 1990 through an endowment by Laurance S. Rockefeller.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部作品的语言实在令人耳目一新,作者似乎拥有一种独特的魔力,能将那些晦涩难懂的社会学理论,包裹在一层既富有诗意又充满洞察力的外衣之下。我尤其欣赏其中对于“他者”身份建构的细致入微的剖析,那种对细微差别和复杂语境的拿捏,远超出了我预期的学术深度。它不是那种生硬地堆砌术语的教科书,更像是一场精心编排的、引人入胜的思辨之旅。读到某些章节时,我甚至需要停下来,反复咀嚼那些精妙的比喻和转折,感受它们在脑海中激荡出的回响。那种对历史脉络与当代实践之间张力的精准捕捉,使得整本书充满了鲜活的生命力,它迫使你跳出既有的思维框架,用一种更加立体、更加包容的视角去重新审视我们习以为常的社会结构。整体而言,阅读过程是一种持续的、令人兴奋的智力挑战,同时又充满了发现新大陆般的愉悦。
评分我必须说,这本书的叙事节奏掌握得极其高明,它像一部结构精巧的交响乐,有着舒缓的慢板,也有着激昂的高潮。作者在推进核心论点时,似乎深谙悬念设置之道,总能在关键时刻抛出一个颠覆性的观点,让人忍不住一口气读完。更令人称道的是,书中对不同文化群体案例的选取和呈现,展现出一种近乎田野调查般的扎实感,而非空洞的理论臆测。那些引用的具体事件和人物故事,如同一块块棱镜,折射出理论的光芒,使得抽象的讨论变得触手可及,充满了人情味。这种将宏大理论与微观叙事完美融合的手法,极大地增强了文本的说服力和感染力。我读到一些关于边缘群体自我赋权的段落时,那种压抑已久的情感仿佛找到了宣泄的出口,让人读后久久不能平静,深刻体会到“被看见”的重量。
评分这本书的哲学思辨部分,无疑是其最引人入胜的核心所在。作者对于“承认”这一概念的解构与重构,简直可以称得上是教科书级别的范例。它不是简单地重复已有的框架,而是深入到承认的本体论基础和实践困境之中,提出了许多令人拍案叫绝的见解。特别是关于承认的“双刃剑”效应的探讨,那种对复杂性、悖论性的深刻洞察,体现出作者深厚的理论功底和敏锐的批判精神。我感觉自己仿佛在跟一位学识渊博却又毫不傲慢的导师对话,他引导你质疑那些看似坚不可摧的既有观念,并鼓励你去建构更具韧性的理解。对于任何致力于深入理解当代政治伦理和身份政治的人来说,这本书提供了一个不可或缺的参照系,它的价值远超出了特定学科的范畴。
评分坦白讲,我最初对这类题材的著作抱持着一丝警惕,担心它会落入学院派的自娱自乐,或者变成一套陈旧的意识形态宣传。然而,这部作品完全出乎我的意料。它的论证过程极为严谨,每一步推导都建立在坚实的逻辑基础之上,但同时,其对现实世界中不公正现象的关注又是如此热切和真诚。这种理论的深度与现实的关怀的完美结合,使得阅读体验异常充实。我可以清晰地感受到作者在文本中注入的热情,那种致力于推动社会理解进步的强烈愿望。书中关于如何构建更具包容性的公共领域的讨论,提供了许多富有建设性的、可以付诸实践的思考方向,而不是仅仅停留在批判的层面,这一点非常难能可贵。
评分这本书的排版和装帧本身也值得一提,虽然这属于外在因素,但它确实影响了我的阅读心境。内文的字体选择和段落间距,处理得恰到好处,使得长时间阅读也不会感到视觉疲劳,这对于一本需要深度思考的作品来说至关重要。更重要的是,作者在章节过渡和主题切换时,那种流畅自然的衔接,几乎让人意识不到是在阅读一个复杂的学术论述,更像是在欣赏一部精心打磨过的艺术品。它成功地将学术的严谨性与文学的审美性融为一体,达到了罕见的平衡。阅读完毕后,我将它放回书架,心中涌起一种强烈的冲动,想要立刻向所有对此领域感兴趣的朋友强力推荐,因为这不仅是一次知识的获取,更是一次审美与智识上的愉悦体验。
评分可能Taylor这辈子写作上做的的最清楚的就是这篇文章吧……
评分好书 而且我的Honor Thesis 突然有了灵感
评分可能Taylor这辈子写作上做的的最清楚的就是这篇文章吧……
评分可能Taylor这辈子写作上做的的最清楚的就是这篇文章吧……
评分按照课上的要求精读了一章The Politics of Recognition.对这个老头的语言简直欲罢不能。课程论文的灵感来源。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有