作者簡介：

邁剋爾•紮科特（Michael P. Zuckert） 列奧•斯特勞斯學派重要成員。1974年取得芝加哥大學博士學位，現為美國聖母大學（University of Notre Dame）政治學係教授、主任。研究領域包括政治哲學、美國憲法與理論、美國政治思想等。另著有《自然權利的共和國》（The Natural Rights Republic: Studies in the Foundation of the American Political Tradition）和《開創自由主義：論洛剋的政治哲學》（Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy）等，即將齣版《完善憲法：南北戰爭後的修正案》（Completing the Constitution: The Post-Civil War Amendments）。

譯者簡介：

王崬興 史學博士，浙江萬裏學院法學院教師。主要研究方嚮為美國政治思想史。著有《製度變遷與美國南部的崛起》（浙江人民齣版社，2002年）。

In "Natural Rights and the New Republicanism", Michael Zuckert proposes a new view of the political philosophy that lay behind the founding of the United States. In a book that will interest political scientists, historians, and philosophers, Zuckert looks at the Whig or opposition tradition as it developed in England. He argues that there were, in fact, three opposition traditions: Protestant, Grotian, and Lockean. Before the English Civil War the opposition was inspired by the effort to find the 'one true Protestant politics - an effort that was seen to be a failure by the end of the Interregnum period. The Restoration saw the emergence of the Whigs, who sought a way to ground politics free from the sectarian theological-scriptural conflicts of the previous period.The Whigs were particularly influenced by the Dutch natural law philosopher Hugo Grotius. However, as Zuckert shows, by the mid-eighteenth century John Locke had replaced Grotius as the philosopher of the Whigs. Zuckert's analysis concludes with a penetrating examination of John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, the English 'Cato,' who, he argues, brought together Lockean political philosophy and pre-existing. Whig political science into a new and powerful synthesis. Although it has been misleadingly presented as a separate 'classical republican' tradition in recent scholarly discussions, it is this 'new republicanism' that served as the philosophical point of departure for the founders of the American republic.