Metaphysics begins with sketching the history of philosophy. For Aristotle, philosophy arose historically after basic necessities were secured. Metaphysics is Aristotle's version of philosophy examining the nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, substance and attribute, fact and value. Aristotle argues that there are a handful of universal truths. Aristotle's works have influenced science, religion, and philosophy for nearly two thousand years. He could be thought of as the father of logical thought. Aristotle wrote: "There is nothing in the intellect that was not first in the senses." He wrote that everything that is learned in life is learned through sensory perception. Aristotle was the first to establish the founding principle of logic. The great writer Dante called Aristotle "The Master of those who know."
具體描述
讀後感
亚里士多德应该是第一个哲学的集大成者。 他的《形而上学》，可以视作是第一部哲学史。 其中既谈到了自己的哲学创见，比如对本体的确认，四因的提出，等等；更难能可贵的是，他对前人的总结比较分析，给后世留下了宝贵的研究资料。 但那些立足定义概念的讨论又是十分原始的，所...
評分Book I(Α), Ch.1-2; Book XII(Λ), Ch.6-10 一如既往Joe Sachs翻译，仁者见仁，智者见智。两个tutor一个再喜欢不过，一个觉得这个翻译不是英文，读不通，不推荐学生使用。 反正是不是流畅的英文我也读不出来，意思接近原文就好了。本身文本已经够难读懂了，在加上译者自身...
評分亚里士多德的《形而上学》确实是一门科学奠基之作，探寻的是“事物之所以成为事物”的原因，这样一种作为存在的存在，也就是实体。这个实体在这里是一种“必然性存在”，但是这种“必然性存在”是否是一种“实在性”或者说“现实性存在”，似乎亚里士多德并不关注。 而随着科学...
評分当我们失去了动力，激情，欲望，不是我们身体的故障。而是我们已渐渐丧失咀嚼抽象概念的能力。所有人都宣布他们拥有的童年是幸福的（少数人的不幸童年仅仅是童年等同于幸福的反证。正如人本质上能看能听，我们才能瞎能聋一般），这种幸福感，各人有各自的解读，这些解读又大致...
評分亚里士多德在本书中从本体论角度重点批判了柏拉图理念说与毕德哥拉斯学派的数论，厘清了哲学的基本问题，追问何为“是”，何为“一”，可以看成是亚里士多德哲学建立的基石，即回答了何为哲学和哲学何为两个根本问题。（注：由于输入法，重音有错误处，还请自行查对） 一、希腊...
用戶評價
難 難 難
评分http://ishare.iask.sina.com.cn/search.php?key=Metaphysics+-+Aristotle+&from=index&format= 有爾雅、史傳的地位。
评分A very different reading experience. Not so much to work through the finer technical details (which probably would take month/years, and reading a lot a commentary). More like to get a sense of what type of questions the man and his contemporaries were asking and what counts as "answers." Quite a good overview of the philosophical landscape of his
评分A very different reading experience. Not so much to work through the finer technical details (which probably would take month/years, and reading a lot a commentary). More like to get a sense of what type of questions the man and his contemporaries were asking and what counts as "answers." Quite a good overview of the philosophical landscape of his
评分膜拜完畢 wrestling with substance
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有