A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 政治學 英文原版 政治科學 政治 英文版 社會科學 社會學 研究方法
發表於2024-11-22
A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
意圖接續宏觀政體論理論傳統、係統與歸因視角及大規模跨國比較(薩托利、利普哈特、普特南等)的方法論,不過留下瞭諸多問題。整本書中兩作者似乎都沒有認真搞清楚幾個基本問題對於理論的意義:政治vs行政的二分(基本假定政治集權自然保證行政隨政治而動),囊括性體製的存在是否一定意味著實際決策中政治/行政權力的集中(附錄中對否決節點理論的討論仍有所不足),囊括性體製本身作為民主結果而不是原因、終端而非起點的問題(整個因果關係是否倒置瞭),善治的道德意義與可測量標準(基本還是偏嚮於采用發展理論中通用的標準而缺少理論和倫理的討論)等等。另外方法論也有可討論之處:纍積指數的計算辦法有些奇怪,似乎隻是簡單相加且假定瞭持續的貶損權重,而缺少動態考慮;測量中繼續迷信找P值而因果討論不足;民主門檻是否仍過低等。
評分意圖接續宏觀政體論理論傳統、係統與歸因視角及大規模跨國比較(薩托利、利普哈特、普特南等)的方法論,不過留下瞭諸多問題。整本書中兩作者似乎都沒有認真搞清楚幾個基本問題對於理論的意義:政治vs行政的二分(基本假定政治集權自然保證行政隨政治而動),囊括性體製的存在是否一定意味著實際決策中政治/行政權力的集中(附錄中對否決節點理論的討論仍有所不足),囊括性體製本身作為民主結果而不是原因、終端而非起點的問題(整個因果關係是否倒置瞭),善治的道德意義與可測量標準(基本還是偏嚮於采用發展理論中通用的標準而缺少理論和倫理的討論)等等。另外方法論也有可討論之處:纍積指數的計算辦法有些奇怪,似乎隻是簡單相加且假定瞭持續的貶損權重,而缺少動態考慮;測量中繼續迷信找P值而因果討論不足;民主門檻是否仍過低等。
評分意圖接續宏觀政體論理論傳統、係統與歸因視角及大規模跨國比較(薩托利、利普哈特、普特南等)的方法論,不過留下瞭諸多問題。整本書中兩作者似乎都沒有認真搞清楚幾個基本問題對於理論的意義:政治vs行政的二分(基本假定政治集權自然保證行政隨政治而動),囊括性體製的存在是否一定意味著實際決策中政治/行政權力的集中(附錄中對否決節點理論的討論仍有所不足),囊括性體製本身作為民主結果而不是原因、終端而非起點的問題(整個因果關係是否倒置瞭),善治的道德意義與可測量標準(基本還是偏嚮於采用發展理論中通用的標準而缺少理論和倫理的討論)等等。另外方法論也有可討論之處:纍積指數的計算辦法有些奇怪,似乎隻是簡單相加且假定瞭持續的貶損權重,而缺少動態考慮;測量中繼續迷信找P值而因果討論不足;民主門檻是否仍過低等。
評分意圖接續宏觀政體論理論傳統、係統與歸因視角及大規模跨國比較(薩托利、利普哈特、普特南等)的方法論,不過留下瞭諸多問題。整本書中兩作者似乎都沒有認真搞清楚幾個基本問題對於理論的意義:政治vs行政的二分(基本假定政治集權自然保證行政隨政治而動),囊括性體製的存在是否一定意味著實際決策中政治/行政權力的集中(附錄中對否決節點理論的討論仍有所不足),囊括性體製本身作為民主結果而不是原因、終端而非起點的問題(整個因果關係是否倒置瞭),善治的道德意義與可測量標準(基本還是偏嚮於采用發展理論中通用的標準而缺少理論和倫理的討論)等等。另外方法論也有可討論之處:纍積指數的計算辦法有些奇怪,似乎隻是簡單相加且假定瞭持續的貶損權重,而缺少動態考慮;測量中繼續迷信找P值而因果討論不足;民主門檻是否仍過低等。
評分意圖接續宏觀政體論理論傳統、係統與歸因視角及大規模跨國比較(薩托利、利普哈特、普特南等)的方法論,不過留下瞭諸多問題。整本書中兩作者似乎都沒有認真搞清楚幾個基本問題對於理論的意義:政治vs行政的二分(基本假定政治集權自然保證行政隨政治而動),囊括性體製的存在是否一定意味著實際決策中政治/行政權力的集中(附錄中對否決節點理論的討論仍有所不足),囊括性體製本身作為民主結果而不是原因、終端而非起點的問題(整個因果關係是否倒置瞭),善治的道德意義與可測量標準(基本還是偏嚮於采用發展理論中通用的標準而缺少理論和倫理的討論)等等。另外方法論也有可討論之處:纍積指數的計算辦法有些奇怪,似乎隻是簡單相加且假定瞭持續的貶損權重,而缺少動態考慮;測量中繼續迷信找P值而因果討論不足;民主門檻是否仍過低等。
John Gerring, Boston University
John Gerring (PhD, University of California, Berkeley, 1993) is Professor of Political Science at Boston University, where he teaches courses on methodology and comparative politics. His books include Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996 (Cambridge University Press, 1998), Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework (Cambridge University Press, 2001), Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Cambridge University Press, 2007), Concepts and Method: Giovanni Sartori and his Legacy (Routledge, 2009), Social Science Methodology: Tasks, Strategies, and Criteria (Cambridge University Press, 2011), Global Justice: A Prioritarian Manifesto (in process), and Democracy and Development: A Historical Perspective (in process). He served as a fellow of the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton, NJ), as a member of The National Academy of Sciences' Committee on the Evaluation of USAID Programs to Support the Development of Democracy, as President of the American Political Science Association's Organized Section on Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, and is the current recipient of a grant from the National Science Foundation to collect historical data related to colonialism and long-term development.
Strom C. Thacker
CAS Associate Dean of the Faculty, Social Sciences
Professor of International Relations and Political Science.
Expertise:Human Development, International Relations, Latin America, Political EconomyEducation:
BA, Pomona College
MA, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Strom Thacker’s research and teaching focus broadly on questions of political economy, governance and development, with a regional focus on Mexico and Latin America. His books include Big Business, the State, and Free Trade: Constructing Coalitions in Mexico (Cambridge University Press, 2000), A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance (with John Gerring, Cambridge University Press, 2008), and Democracy and Development: A Historical Perspective (with John Gerring, in process). He is also working on a project on the politics of human development. He has published articles in the American Political Science Review, the British Journal of Political Science, Business and Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Global Public Health, International Organization, the Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, the Journal of Politics, Social Science & Medicine, and World Politics. He also has an ongoing interest in the politics of foreign aid and lending, and the International Monetary Fund.
This book outlines the importance of political institutions in achieving good governance within a democratic polity and sets forth an argument to explore what sorts of institutions do the job best. By focusing on 'centripetal institutions', which maximize both representation and authority by bringing political energy and actors toward the centre of a polity, the authors set forth a relatively novel theory of democratic governance, applicable to all political settings in which multi-party competition obtains. Basing their theory on national-level political institutions, the authors argue that there are three types of political institutions that are fundamental in securing a centripetal style of democratic governance: unitary (rather than federal) sovereignty, a parliamentary (rather than presidential) executive, and a closed-list PR electoral system (rather than a single-member district or preferential-vote system).
評分
評分
評分
評分
A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024