Jacob Eyferth is Associate Professor of Modern Chinese History in the Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, the Department of History, and the College, University of Chicago.
This book charts the vicissitudes of a rural community of papermakers in Sichuan. The process of transforming bamboo into paper involves production-related and social skills, as well as the everyday skills that allowed these papermakers to survive in an era of tumultuous change. The Chinese revolution - understood as a series of interconnected political, social, and technological transformations - was, Jacob Eyferth argues, as much about the redistribution of skill, knowledge, and technical control as it was about the redistribution of land and political power. The larger context for this study is the 'rural-urban divide': the institutional, social, and economic cleavages that separate rural people from urbanites. This book traces the changes in the distribution of knowledge that led to a massive transfer of technical control from villages to cities, from primary producers to managerial elites, and from women to men. It asks how a vision of rural people as unskilled has affected their place in the body politic and contributed to their disenfranchisement. By viewing skill as a contested resource, subject to distribution struggles, it addresses the issue of how revolution, state-making, and marketization have changed rural China.
一、被遗忘 这是一部一个中国乡村的社会史。 故事发生在夹江县。夹江,可能大多数人都不知道它落在地图的哪块区域,我们很难注意到它。就像我家乡所在的高安,外乡人是不大知道这地方的,即便高安和夹江一样,都和造纸有丝丝关联(高安发现的华林造纸作坊遗址是目前我国发现最...
评分一、被遗忘 这是一部一个中国乡村的社会史。 故事发生在夹江县。夹江,可能大多数人都不知道它落在地图的哪块区域,我们很难注意到它。就像我家乡所在的高安,外乡人是不大知道这地方的,即便高安和夹江一样,都和造纸有丝丝关联(高安发现的华林造纸作坊遗址是目前我国发现最...
评分一个四川手工造纸村20世纪的社会史,因为是历史,期间大量叙述可以如故事一般阅读,障碍不大,本书阐述了造纸特色村的技术、家庭、宗族、经济、政治等发展过程,对大跃进之后的近代部分理解更有感触,荒唐的年代里发生的荒唐事情,从另一个角度观看今天社会,不论美国还是其他...
评分这是一部描述四川农村手工造纸技艺20世纪社会变迁史的著作。该村落地处成都与乐山之间的夹江县。作者是艾约博(Jacob Eyferth,1962-),美国芝加哥大学中国现代史专业副教授,东亚语言文明系系主任。该书获得2011年度美国亚洲研究学会的“列文森奖”。 这种小范围的实地考察...
评分结果发现是读过的《以竹为生》啊记忆不好也挺好。
评分结果发现是读过的《以竹为生》啊记忆不好也挺好。
评分变迁类上乘作品,传统VS现代经典命题,机器化大生产和手工业并非替代关系,但前者一定是后者的敌人。
评分越来越对乡村史-民族志感到无趣.....你们就不能谈些再有趣一点的问题么...
评分导论技惊四座,对skill此概念的解读既参考欧陆哲学与经济学literature又与中国现实结合。前六章以deskilling,modernization,state-building为线索,依照chronological的顺序书写夹江的历史。然而第七章开始偏离对skill对讨论而转向宗族和市场,有虎头蛇尾之嫌。其实后三章单独看都是很好的ethnography,尤其是最后一章对于造纸人竖族谱这一行为之意涵的解读非常sophisticated。Conclusion放大视野,与Scott等人对话,进一步阐述现代化和国家建设的implication,并把deskilling这一过程与经济发展结合讨论。冒昧讲一句,感觉正是Eyferth忠实于材料(不剪裁)的写法才造成了后面几章脱节的感觉。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有