Private Truths, Public Lies 在线电子书 图书标签: 政治学 集体行动 【社会学】 文化 哲学 【政治学】 Politics 比较政治
发表于2024-12-25
Private Truths, Public Lies 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024
若無言論自由,無奈私下吐衷曲。
评分Identified the gap between private preferences and public expressions. For Kuran, the average level of grievances does not matter much for protest breakouts, whereas the dynamic distribution of private falsification does. Sophisticated and appealing as a theory, while hard to falsify—an issue, while further confirms the theory.
评分若無言論自由,無奈私下吐衷曲。
评分Identified the gap between private preferences and public expressions. For Kuran, the average level of grievances does not matter much for protest breakouts, whereas the dynamic distribution of private falsification does. Sophisticated and appealing as a theory, while hard to falsify—an issue, while further confirms the theory.
评分Identified the gap between private preferences and public expressions. For Kuran, the average level of grievances does not matter much for protest breakouts, whereas the dynamic distribution of private falsification does. Sophisticated and appealing as a theory, while hard to falsify—an issue, while further confirms the theory.
Preference falsification, according to Timur Kuran, is the act of misrepresenting one's wants under perceived social pressures. In this book Kuran argues that the phenomenon not only is ubiquitous but has huge social and political consequences. Drawing on diverse intellectual traditions, including those rooted in economics, psychology, sociology, and political science, he provides a unified theory of how preference falsification shapes collective decisions, orients structural change, sustains social stability, distorts human knowledge, and conceals political possibilities. Kuran argues that people's choices, and even their desires, are a function of social and psychological conditions and above all pressures imposed by other people.
一个人会隐藏对自己不利的信息,释放对自己有利的信息。问题是如何判断何为对已有利,何为对己不利。在某些问题上,一个比较简单的判断标准是持某观点的人数。 拿转基因食品为例,如果我相信赞同转基因食品的人为99%,反对转基因食品的人为1%,那么我最好也是赞同转基因食品,...
评分一个人会隐藏对自己不利的信息,释放对自己有利的信息。问题是如何判断何为对已有利,何为对己不利。在某些问题上,一个比较简单的判断标准是持某观点的人数。 拿转基因食品为例,如果我相信赞同转基因食品的人为99%,反对转基因食品的人为1%,那么我最好也是赞同转基因食品,...
评分一个人会隐藏对自己不利的信息,释放对自己有利的信息。问题是如何判断何为对已有利,何为对己不利。在某些问题上,一个比较简单的判断标准是持某观点的人数。 拿转基因食品为例,如果我相信赞同转基因食品的人为99%,反对转基因食品的人为1%,那么我最好也是赞同转基因食品,...
评分一个人会隐藏对自己不利的信息,释放对自己有利的信息。问题是如何判断何为对已有利,何为对己不利。在某些问题上,一个比较简单的判断标准是持某观点的人数。 拿转基因食品为例,如果我相信赞同转基因食品的人为99%,反对转基因食品的人为1%,那么我最好也是赞同转基因食品,...
评分一个人会隐藏对自己不利的信息,释放对自己有利的信息。问题是如何判断何为对已有利,何为对己不利。在某些问题上,一个比较简单的判断标准是持某观点的人数。 拿转基因食品为例,如果我相信赞同转基因食品的人为99%,反对转基因食品的人为1%,那么我最好也是赞同转基因食品,...
Private Truths, Public Lies 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024